Re: interface down, console output: igb3: TX(7) desc avail = 41, pidx = 308

2017-03-27 Thread Kevin Bowling
Try turning TSO off.. i.e. ifconfig igb3 -tso or sysctl net.inet.tcp.tso=0 The transition to iflib has exposed much jankiness in the Intel "shared code" of the e1000 drivers. In particular, the locking contracts may not align with FreeBSD locking primitives. I have boxes running the legacy drive

Re: Error at the time of compiling netmap-fwd on -CURRENT

2017-03-27 Thread Kevin Bowling
Hi, The DPRINTF macro in netmap-fwd is defined as #define *DPRINTF*(_fmt, args...) if (verbose) dprintf(_fmt, ## args) while dprintf is defined as dprintf(int fd, const char * restrict format, ...); in stdio.h You could try, simplistically, to change DPRINTF macro to #define *DPRINTF*(_fmt, arg

[Bug 217606] Bridge stops working after some days

2017-03-27 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217606 --- Comment #14 from Aiko Barz --- Maybe nothing you like to hear, but I tried the pufferfish. It is running for some days now without issues so far and it handles the workload quite well. We cannot utilize the full 10Gbit/s at the moment

[Bug 212018] Enable IPSEC_NAT_T in GENERIC kernel configuration

2017-03-27 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212018 Alex Dupre changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a...@freebsd.org --- Comment #7 from

Re: Error at the time of compiling netmap-fwd on -CURRENT

2017-03-27 Thread John Jasen
FreeBSD 11 and prior, dprintf in stdio.h had to be specifically called by setting particular defines. These were removed in -CURRENT, which caused dprintf from /usr/include/stdio.h to coflict with the declarations in netmap-fwd. Commenting out the #define and the int dprintf statements in netmap-f

Re: bad throughput performance on multiple systems: Re: Fwd: Re: Disappointing packets-per-second performance results on a Dell,PE R530

2017-03-27 Thread John Jasen
On 03/24/2017 08:51 PM, Navdeep Parhar wrote: > On 03/24/2017 16:53, Caraballo-vega, Jordan A. (GSFC-6062)[COMPUTER > SCIENCE CORP] wrote: >> It looks like netmap is there; however, is there a way of figuring out >> if netmap is being used? > > If you're not running netmap-fwd or some other netmap

[Bug 212018] Enable IPSEC_NAT_T in GENERIC kernel configuration

2017-03-27 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212018 --- Comment #8 from Andrey V. Elsukov --- (In reply to Alex Dupre from comment #7) > Does this mean that StrongSwan will finally work OOTB on FreeBSD 11.1? :-) You can test and report. I have one report about panics with strongswan on stab

[Bug 217721] axge(4) hangs while link goes offline

2017-03-27 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217721 --- Comment #7 from Pyun YongHyeon --- (In reply to Eugene Lozovoy from comment #6) Added Kevin(driver author) to CC list. Let's see whether he has a better idea on the issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee f