sepherosa_gmail.com added a comment.
In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8904#185970, @karels wrote:
> I think the change is a step in the right direction. Certainly, "ifconfig
xxN down" followed by an implicit UP should not cause any change to the routing
table. Does anyone know why the "
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215682
Hajimu UMEMOTO changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |In Progress
Assignee|fr
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> On 03 Jan 2017, at 17:21, Julien Cigar wrote:
>
> is it not the same issue as PR 211990 ? can you try by turning off jumbo
> frames ?
Hi Julien,
With bug 211990 (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211990),
the main issue was that iSCSI disks did not disconnect properly, so that
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211219
--- Comment #10 from Daniel G ---
We're trying to triage a simmilar problem, where after a (panic) reboot the NIC
remains in "no carrier" state, while the switch thinks the link is online. Our
nic's are using lagg with active/passive failov
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211219
--- Comment #11 from Franco Fichtner ---
Hi Daniel,
If this is ix(4) as per your indication, you need:
hw.ix.enable_msix=0
Cheers,
Franco
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_
gnn accepted this revision.
This revision has a positive review.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8905
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com, delphij, royger, decui_microsoft.com,
honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0su_g
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215778
m...@sentex.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|coredump when loading cxgb |coredump when loading
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173478
Hiren Panchasara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|an...@freebsd.org |freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
--- Com
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95277
--- Comment #7 from Hiren Panchasara ---
Provided feedback is missing from the PR. Can someone add that?
Is this still valid?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167325
Hiren Panchasara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|In Pro
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=140597
Hiren Panchasara changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hi...@freebsd.org
Ass
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=130628
Hiren Panchasara changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hi...@freebsd.org
S
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=145825
Hiren Panchasara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |Overcome By Events
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=155597
Hiren Panchasara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |Overcome By Events
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207200
Hiren Panchasara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194697
Hiren Panchasara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117733
Hiren Panchasara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
--- Com
tl;dr --> igbX devices will become emX devices
We're about to commit an update to sys/dev/e1000 that will implement and
activate IFLIB for em(4), lem(4) & igb(4) and would appreciate all folks
who can test and poke at the drivers to do so this week. This will have
some really great changes for pe
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rS311475: if: Defer the if_up until the ifnet.if_ioctl is
called. (authored by sephe).
CHANGED PRIOR TO COMMIT
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8905?vs=23258&id=23645#toc
REPOSITORY
rS FreeBSD src reposito
glebius added a comment.
I don't think that the patch is in the right direction. The problem comes
from historical behavior that assigning an address is implicit UP. For a modern
networking equipment it is a normal administrative situation that sysadmin
wants to assign an address or an alias
sepherosa_gmail.com abandoned this revision.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8904
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com, delphij, royger, decui_microsoft.com,
honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0su_gmail.com, adrian, bz
sepherosa_gmail.com created this revision.
sepherosa_gmail.com added reviewers: jhb, decui_microsoft.com.
sepherosa_gmail.com added a subscriber: freebsd-net-list.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9058
AFFECTED FILES
share/man/man4/alc.4
sys/dev/alc/if_alc.c
sys/dev/alc/if_alc
23 matches
Mail list logo