This query here talks about a similar scenario -
https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/26050/
Only difference being that in my case, ARP replies are actually received.
Thanks,
Rohit
On 07/12/16, 1:12 PM, "owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org on behalf of Rohit Atri
(ratri)" wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I have E
On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Chris Torek wrote:
>>... Dropping the lock is entirely the wrong thing to do -- as
>>you note, if we do, then the bridge members can change out from
>>under us. The only path forward is to use an sx lock, but ...
> [snip]
>>In code paths that modify the list of br
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 05:41:51PM +0800, Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Chris Torek wrote:
> >>... Dropping the lock is entirely the wrong thing to do -- as
> >>you note, if we do, then the bridge members can change out from
> >>under us. The only path forward is to us
It was reported to pfSense [1] and I already opened a bugzilla ticket [2].
It’s reproducible on all versions >= 11.0.
I was not sure about who could be assigned on ticket then I decided to send it
here on the list. Looks like a regression that would be nice to see fixed.
[1] https://redmine.pfs
