https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214832
--- Comment #5 from Kristof Provost ---
I believe this affects everything. The bug seems to have been introduced with a
merge from OpenBSD about five years ago.
Considering the low severity, the proximity of the EOL date and the pain of
me
oleg updated this revision to Diff 22728.
oleg added a comment.
1. fix issues reported by sbahra_repnop.org here:
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1945
2. fix synchronization chain (producer -> producer -> consumer) noted by alc.
3. massive comments.
CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE
https://review
oleg added a reviewer: sbahra_repnop.org.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8637
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: oleg, kmacy, kib, alc, sbahra_repnop.org
Cc: emaste, freebsd-net-list
___
Let me confirm I understand what's happening:
1) You want to use your router to vlan-tag traffic from your network, and
then send it out of a lagg over bce interfaces. The bxe interfaces have
their MTU set to 1500 and the vlan interface to 1496
2) The TiVo is sending packets with a payload size o
> On Dec 6, 2016, at 09:34, Ryan Stone wrote:
>
> Let me confirm I understand what's happening:
>
> 1) You want to use your router to vlan-tag traffic from your network, and
> then send it out of a lagg over bce interfaces. The bxe interfaces have
> their MTU set to 1500 and the vlan interfa
Hi,
I am wondering if there a way to reduce the CPU usage of a netmap program
similar to the bridge.c example.
In my use case, I have a distributed application/framework (e.g. Spark or
Hadoop) running on a cluster of machines (each of the machines runs Linux
and has an Intel 10Gbps NIC). The appl
Hello,
I have EC2 instance with a custom FreeBSD kernel (9.2-RELEASE) with two
interfaces – nic0 & nic1. Both have elastic IPs associated - E0 & E1.
I noticed that when I ping E1, the ICMP response packets go out of nic1 instead
of nic0 & thus, from the ping source perspective, host is down. T
