ifconfig creates a bogus(?) route

2016-05-28 Thread Bruce Evans
Sometime between r191220 and r201220, ifconfig started creating a bogus(?) static route. The following is under r248255 with "ifconfig em0 inet 192.168.2.8" (where 192.168.2.8 is for the local host and I don't bother typing the netmsk) done before bringing up lo0: Routing tables Internet: Desti

Re: IPv6, ULAs and FreeBSD

2016-05-28 Thread Mark Tinka
On 28/May/16 08:38, Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff wrote: > Thanks for repeating that. That's how I understood it as a novice too. > :-) And that's why I thought I should not go for them. Because I don't > have many GUAs available, I thought I should go for ULAs then. Why don't you have GUA IPv6

RE: ifconfig creates a bogus(?) route

2016-05-28 Thread David DeSimone
Bruce Evans wrote: > Sometime between r191220 and r201220, ifconfig started creating a bogus(?) > static route. > The following is under r248255 with "ifconfig em0 inet 192.168.2.8" (where > 192.168.2.8 is > for the local host and I don't bother typing the netmsk) done before bringing > up lo0:

Re: IPv6, ULAs and FreeBSD

2016-05-28 Thread Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff
Mark Tinka [2016-05-28 14:11 +0200] : > Why don't you have GUA IPv6 address space? > > Your ISP should be able to assign you a /48 or /56 prefix for you to > use on your LAN. That's more than plenty of space. As I wrote, I only got a /112 form my ISP. This still exceeds the amount of addresses t

Re: ifconfig creates a bogus(?) route

2016-05-28 Thread Kimmo Paasiala
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Bruce Evans wrote: > Sometime between r191220 and r201220, ifconfig started creating a bogus(?) > static route. The following is under r248255 with > "ifconfig em0 inet 192.168.2.8" (where 192.168.2.8 is for the local host > and I don't bother typing the netmsk)

Re: IPv6, ULAs and FreeBSD

2016-05-28 Thread Mark Tinka
On 28/May/16 20:40, Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff wrote: > As I wrote, I only got a /112 form my ISP. This still exceeds the amount > of addresses that I need but I decided to go for ULAs for flexibility. > > Anyway, it's working. :-) I'd suggest going back to your ISP and asking for at least a

RE: ifconfig creates a bogus(?) route

2016-05-28 Thread Bruce Evans
Bruce Evans wrote: Sometime between r191220 and r201220, ifconfig started creating a bogus(?) static route. The following is under r248255 with "ifconfig em0 inet 192.168.2.8" (where 192.168.2.8 is for the local host and I don't bother typing the netmsk) done before bringing up lo0: Routing t