https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204831
scheff...@beuth-hochschule.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||scheffler@beuth-hoch
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204831
--- Comment #3 from Andrey V. Elsukov ---
(In reply to scheffler from comment #2)
> are you sure you are reading the traces correctly?
>
> 1.) Maximum Response Code (Delay) is set to 1 (10s) by the router. Which
> is the default value
On Sat, 28 Nov 2015 18:06:45 +0800
Julian Elischer wrote:
> next time it happens try flushing the arp table.
Just tried...
arp -d -a
... didn't help. Followed by refreshing default route, which solved it
again.
--
Dan
___
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204831
--- Comment #4 from Andrey V. Elsukov ---
It looks I was wrong again:
"Therefore, to enhance protocol robustness, in spite of the possible
unreliability of message exchanges, messages are retransmitted several times.
Furthermore, timers a
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204831
--- Comment #5 from scheff...@beuth-hochschule.de ---
(In reply to Andrey V. Elsukov from comment #4)
Correct. Repeated transmission is only expected for 'state change reports'.
Otherwise section 9.4 applies and takes care of lost reports:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204831
--- Comment #6 from scheff...@beuth-hochschule.de ---
Created attachment 163679
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=163679&action=edit
Wireshark trace from Linux system
This trace shows the mldv2 traffic between a Linu
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204831
Andrey V. Elsukov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org |a...@freebsd.org
--
You are r
On 30/11/2015 5:18 PM, Daniel Bilik wrote:
On Sat, 28 Nov 2015 18:06:45 +0800
Julian Elischer wrote:
next time it happens try flushing the arp table.
Just tried...
arp -d -a
... didn't help. Followed by refreshing default route, which solved it
ok next time try
netstat -raAnW before and
No one has a theory?
/Elof
On Thu, 5 Nov 2015, el...@sentor.se wrote:
Hi all!
Why don't ngrep work on ix interfaces?
It shows nice values if I sniff on other interfaces, e.g. igb0 and
bridge0:
# ngrep -d igb0 "q" ip
I see some matching packets. Everything looks good.
# netstat -B
Pid
Hi Christian.
So... Any news regarding this?
Should I create a bugzilla so the ball don't get dropped?
/Elof
On Fri, 6 Nov 2015, Christian Peron wrote:
It needs to get fixed.. let me generate a patch for you and you can test it.
On Nov 5, 2015, at 8:51 AM, el...@sentor.se wrote:
On Thu,
OK, I am running current now.
If I run:
tcpdump -ni vale0:2 -w /tmp/2 &
tcpdump -ni vale0:1 -w /tmp/1 &
pkt-gen -i vale0:0 -f tx
I get half of all generated traffic on /tmp/2 and the other half of /tmp/1.
I guess this is the expected behavior, different from what I expected. Is
that the expecte
I'm hoping someone can explain what happened here and this isn't a bug,
but if it is a bug I'll gladly open a PR.
I noticed in my ipfw logs that I was getting a log of "DENY" entries for
an NTP server
Nov 30 13:35:16 gw kernel: ipfw: 4540 Deny UDP
[2604:a880:800:10::bc:c004]:123 [2001:470:1f11:1e
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178079
Michael Moll changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mm...@freebsd.org
Resolutio
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189219
Michael Moll changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mm...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #2 fr
Hi, Mark--
On Nov 30, 2015, at 1:58 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
> [ ... ]
> I noticed my outbound IPv6 didn't have $ks for udp, so I added it.
> However, that had no effect. The solution was to add an incoming rule:
>
> $cmd 03755 allow udp from any to any src-port 123 in via $pif6 $ks
>
> This seem
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189219
Gleb Smirnoff changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|r...@freebsd.org |gleb...@freebsd.org
--- Comment
Hi Everyone!
I am having trouble getting my head around vimage and jail networking. I would
like for my jails to have private IPs (10.0.0.0/24) and only use a single
public IP.
I am having a hard time finding tutorials or information on how to structure my
network. My first thoughts were to cl
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189219
Hiren Panchasara changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lu...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #
Do you have vlans on top of ixgbe?
And actually I wonder what does tcpdump show for the same expression.
( and tcpdump -i ixX -lnes0 might provide good traces on what is going on)
30.11.2015, 19:09, "el...@sentor.se" :
> No one has a theory?
>
> /Elof
>
> On Thu, 5 Nov 2015, el...@sentor.se wrote:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199287
Hiren Panchasara changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hi...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #
On 1 December 2015 at 06:48, Nathan Aherne wrote
> Thank you for helping me to understand vimage better Julian! I have read
> all three links you posted a number of times.
>
> I use iocage for jail management and it uses epair. From your comments it
> seems you recommend netgraph?
>
> This is the
21 matches
Mail list logo
