hselasky updated this revision to Diff 3868.
hselasky added a comment.
Integrate manual page comments from Warren Block.
CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1438?vs=3840&id=3868
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1438
AFFECTED FILES
share/man/man9/Makefile
s
rstone closed this revision.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1881
To: rstone, jfvogel, will
Cc: will, emaste, pjd, freebsd-net
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe,
I'll also note this seems to be somewhat unpredictable.
I installed a dual port intel 10GbE card into one of the systems, I have
not plugged SFP+ modules into them, and three out of four interfaces
were available with the fourth completely AWOL. Rebooting with
hw.ix.unsupported_sfp=1 presented all
I think that you might be a bit confused about the behaviour. An ix
port will only be missing if
a) You have a non-Intel SFP+ installed
b) hw.ix.unsupported_sfp=1 is not set in loader.conf
ix ports that have no SFP+ installed do show up in ifconfig
___
Hi all.
With iptables, I can say something like:
-t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -s 4.5.6.7/32 -d 0/0 -j SNAT --to-source 1.2.3.4
-t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -s 4.5.6.0/24 -d 0/0 -j SNAT --to-source 1.2.3.5
-t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -s 8.9.0.0/24 -d 0/0 -j SNAT --to-source 1.2.3.6
So, traffi
