hselasky added a comment.
Randall: Shooting again:
Thread 1 is executing in "softclock_call_cc()" in the "new_cc =
callout_cpu_switch(c, cc, new_cpu)" it has set "c->c_cpu = CPUBLOCK;"
Thread 2 is now executing callout_reset(). As you can see in the implementation
detail, it is reading "c_cpu"
hselasky added reviewers: network, glebius.
hselasky added a subscriber: freebsd-net.
hselasky set the repository for this revision to rS (FreeBSD src repository).
hselasky updated this revision to Diff 3838.
hselasky added a comment.
Add full context.
CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE
https://reviews.
hselasky updated this revision to Diff 3839.
hselasky added a comment.
Use MIN() macro.
CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1893?vs=3838&id=3839
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1893
AFFECTED FILES
sys/netinet/ip_output.c
To: hselasky, pluknet, ae, np, meli
rrs added a comment.
I have thought long and hard about this. I don't think its a bug.
But to know for sure I will need to add some instrumentation.
I suspect what is happening is a tremendous number of callouts
all come due at the same time. The three back traces trying to stop or reset
a callou
hselasky updated this revision to Diff 3840.
hselasky added a comment.
Integrate manual page comments from Warren Block.
CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1438?vs=3809&id=3840
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1438
AFFECTED FILES
share/man/man9/Makefile
s
Hi All,
Problem resolved with:
FreeBSD rt01.xxx.xxx.xxx 10.1-STABLE FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #3 r276979: Wed
Jan 21 14:04:54 BRST 2015
r...@rt01.xxx.xxx.xxx:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GONDIM amd64
No more errors and stops.
On 01/12/2014 19:29, Pieper, Jeffrey E wrote:
Hi Marcelo,
A couple of questi
hselasky added a comment.
Let me re-phrase if I was unclear:
I see nothing preventing the callout_reset() macro from reading (c)->c_cpu lock
when it is equal to CPUBLOCK while another CPU is calling callout_cpu_switch()
on the same callout.
Especially in the case of a migration case done by th
rrs added a comment.
Ok after much discussion with Hans, we *could* have an issue where the
user sends in an invalid CPU. This is *not* what I think is happening with Hiren
since the cc_cpu and lock is all sane (it would be a invalid index to cc_cpu
which
would not have an init'd lock). But I hav
emaste added a subscriber: emaste.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1881
To: rstone, jfvogel
Cc: emaste, pjd, freebsd-net
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send a
jfvogel accepted this revision.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
BRANCH
review_D1648
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1648
To: rstone, jfvogel
Cc: freebsd-net
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd
rstone closed this revision.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1648
To: rstone, jfvogel
Cc: freebsd-net
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd
jfvogel accepted this revision.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1868
To: rstone, jfvogel
Cc: freebsd-net, pjd
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listi
jfvogel accepted this revision.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1869
To: rstone, jfvogel
Cc: freebsd-net, pjd
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listi
glebius added a reviewer: ken.
glebius added a comment.
This is Ken's code, we probably want him to look at. Looks like a remnant from
zero copy era.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1893
To: hselasky, pluknet, ae, np, melifaro, glebius, hrs, wollman, bryanv, rpaulo,
adrian, bz,
jfvogel accepted this revision.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1870
To: rstone, jfvogel
Cc: freebsd-net, pjd
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listi
will added a subscriber: will.
will added a comment.
What testing has been done with this change?
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1881
To: rstone, jfvogel
Cc: will, emaste, pjd, freebsd-net
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http:/
jfvogel accepted this revision.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1871
To: rstone, jfvogel
Cc: freebsd-net, pjd
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listi
jfvogel accepted this revision.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1872
To: rstone, jfvogel
Cc: freebsd-net, pjd
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listi
jfvogel accepted this revision.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1873
To: rstone, jfvogel
Cc: freebsd-net, pjd
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listi
jfvogel accepted this revision.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1874
To: rstone, jfvogel
Cc: freebsd-net, pjd
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listi
jfvogel accepted this revision.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1876
To: rstone, jfvogel
Cc: freebsd-net, pjd
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listi
jfvogel accepted this revision.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1875
To: rstone, jfvogel
Cc: freebsd-net, pjd
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listi
jfvogel accepted this revision.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1877
To: rstone, jfvogel
Cc: freebsd-net, pjd
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listi
jfvogel accepted this revision.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1878
To: rstone, jfvogel
Cc: freebsd-net, pjd
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listi
jfvogel accepted this revision.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1879
To: rstone, jfvogel
Cc: freebsd-net, pjd
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listi
jfvogel accepted this revision.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1880
To: rstone, jfvogel
Cc: freebsd-net, pjd
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listi
jfvogel accepted this revision.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1882
To: rstone, jfvogel
Cc: freebsd-net, pjd
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listi
jfvogel accepted this revision.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1883
To: rstone, jfvogel
Cc: freebsd-net, pjd
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listi
jfvogel accepted this revision.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1881
To: rstone, jfvogel
Cc: will, emaste, pjd, freebsd-net
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
ken added a comment.
It looks okay to me. The surrounding code has changed a good bit since that
was committed in 2002. By the way, I think Drew Gallatin originally wrote that
chunk of code, but I can't remember for sure.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1893
To: hselasky, pluk
rstone added a comment.
The primary testing that I did was to ensure that a kernel with "device zfs"
would still link. However, I suppose that doesn't exclude the possibility of
their being an zfs source file that is built wrong and doesn't include this
header. Is there a zfs test suite that
will added a comment.
>>! In D1881#9, @rstone wrote:
> The primary testing that I did was to ensure that a kernel with "device zfs"
> would still link. However, I suppose that doesn't exclude the possibility of
> their being an zfs source file that is built wrong and doesn't include this
> hea
pjd added a comment.
Looks good to me, apart from the small nit above.
INLINE COMMENTS
lib/libnv/nv.h:66 Could you please add an empty line after this one for
consistency? Thanks.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1868
To: rstone, jfvogel
Cc: freebsd-net, pjd
___
pjd added a comment.
I like it.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1869
To: rstone, jfvogel
Cc: freebsd-net, pjd
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
pjd added inline comments.
INLINE COMMENTS
lib/libnv/tests/nv_tests.cc:324-331 Don't you want to test the clone here? If
the values wre properly copied, if there is only one element, etc.? Now you are
testing the source nvlist.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1870
To: rstone,
pjd added a comment.
Looks good to me.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1871
To: rstone, jfvogel
Cc: freebsd-net, pjd
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any
pjd accepted this revision.
pjd added a reviewer: pjd.
pjd added a comment.
Looks good to me.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1872
To: rstone, jfvogel, pjd
Cc: freebsd-net, pjd
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebs
pjd accepted this revision.
pjd added a reviewer: pjd.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1871
To: rstone, jfvogel, pjd
Cc: freebsd-net, pjd
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To un
38 matches
Mail list logo