Re: Corrupted IPv6 routing table

2015-01-08 Thread Mike Tancsa
On 1/7/2015 6:14 PM, Przemyslaw Frasunek wrote: Dear all, We are running FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE-p3 on few PPPoE access servers, each servicing about 1000 customers. Each server exchanges customers' /32 (for IPv4) and /64 (for IPv6) routes using OSPF and BIRD. Few times in a month, we are experienc

Re: Corrupted IPv6 routing table

2015-01-08 Thread Tiago Felipe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I use mpd5 v4 and v6 in freebsd 10.0 and 10.1, I had no problem just like your for now. On 01/08/2015 09:54 AM, Mike Tancsa wrote: > On 1/7/2015 6:14 PM, Przemyslaw Frasunek wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> We are running FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE-p3 on few PPP

Re: Corrupted IPv6 routing table

2015-01-08 Thread Alexander V. Chernikov
On 08.01.2015 02:14, Przemyslaw Frasunek wrote: > Dear all, > > We are running FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE-p3 on few PPPoE access servers, each > servicing about 1000 customers. Each server exchanges customers' /32 (for > IPv4) > and /64 (for IPv6) routes using OSPF and BIRD. > > Few times in a month, we

How to get the IP and TCP fields in mbuf

2015-01-08 Thread Wei Hu
Hi, I am wondering if there is existing macros in the FreeBSD kernel to extract to get to the point of the IP and TCP head in a given mbuf. Thanks, Wei ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To

Re: How to get the IP and TCP fields in mbuf

2015-01-08 Thread Julian Kirsch
Hi Wei, Are you looking for something like this? + struct ip *ip = mtod(m, struct ip *); m is a struct mbuf *. You cann look into my knock-patch for FreeBSD [0] for further examples. Best, Julian [0] https://gnunet.org/knock On 08.01.2015 14:18, Wei Hu wrote: > Hi, > > I am wondering i

Re: Corrupted IPv6 routing table

2015-01-08 Thread Przemyslaw Frasunek
>> Has anyone seen this before? > Fixed in 9 by r257389 (So you should try either stable or 10.x). Thanks a lot! I'll schedule an upgrade. ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, se

Re: CARP Problem/Bug? on 10.1-RELEASE

2015-01-08 Thread Patrick Lamaiziere
Le Mon, 05 Jan 2015 07:57:33 +0100, Sascha a écrit : Hello, > you made my day! It's working again. But I continue my research. > > Rebooting takes the Port-Channel on the switch down. When the machine > comes up the port-channel on the switch needs some seconds until it's > up. Any spanning

Re: ntpd bind() failure: Can't assign requested address

2015-01-08 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, > On Wed, 7 Jan 2015 16:56:58 -0800 > hiren panchasara said: hiren> I see this message on july 2014 time-frame -CURRENT. I tried to hiren> disable IPv6 in rc.conf via ipv6_activate_all_interfaces="NO" without hiren> success. hiren> Has this been fixed? Or any workarounds? Perhaps,

Re: ntpd bind() failure: Can't assign requested address

2015-01-08 Thread hiren panchasara
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > Hi, > >> On Wed, 7 Jan 2015 16:56:58 -0800 >> hiren panchasara said: > > hiren> I see this message on july 2014 time-frame -CURRENT. I tried to > hiren> disable IPv6 in rc.conf via ipv6_activate_all_interfaces="NO" without > hiren> s

Re: ntpd bind() failure: Can't assign requested address

2015-01-08 Thread hiren panchasara
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 9:48 AM, hiren panchasara wrote: > On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: >> Hi, >> >>> On Wed, 7 Jan 2015 16:56:58 -0800 >>> hiren panchasara said: >> >> hiren> I see this message on july 2014 time-frame -CURRENT. I tried to >> hiren> disable IPv6 i

Re: CARP Problem/Bug? on 10.1-RELEASE

2015-01-08 Thread Sascha
Spanning Tree is disabled on the ports. Best Regards On 08/01/2015 16:45, Sascha wrote: Le Mon, 05 Jan 2015 07:57:33 +0100, Sascha a écrit : Hello, you made my day! It's working again. But I continue my research. Rebooting takes the Port-Channel on the switch down. When the machine comes u

[Bug 196501] [em] Intel 82573 nic built on my pdsbm-ln2 1U server and only one port will work.

2015-01-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196501 --- Comment #5 from Mark --- Here is my pciconf -lv none1@pci0:2:0:0: class=0x02 card=0x109a15d9 chip=0x109a8086 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 class = network subclass = ethernet em0@pci0:3:0:0: class=0x02 card=0x109a15

[Bug 196501] [em] Intel 82573 nic built on my pdsbm-ln2 1U server and only one port will work.

2015-01-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196501 Mark changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://pastebin.com/tW9Qe3g

[Bug 196501] [em] Intel 82573 nic built on my pdsbm-ln2 1U server and only one port will work.

2015-01-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196501 --- Comment #6 from Mark --- And not a hardware problem, Ubuntu works fine, Windows works fine, only thing that I seen this problem with is going from 8.1 to 10.1 .. Never had any problems and will not have problem if I go back to 8.1 or ru

[Bug 196501] [em] Intel 82573 nic built on my pdsbm-ln2 1U server and only one port will work.

2015-01-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196501 --- Comment #7 from Mark --- Note: I read your reply again. I noticed you do not have a dual port but 2 different chips running. That might by why you can run both -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug