On 12/10/2014 02:05, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> Firstly, various online sources, and the nsupdate man page itself
> say that the name server should create a file called:
>
> /var/run/named/session.key
>
> when the server is started up with at least one "update-policy local;"
> clause wit
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194314
Garrett Cooper changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
--
You a
Should also add here that for those using PF as a firewall that VIMAGE enabled
kernels don't play to well together Unless you like looking at cores all
day.
--
Jason Hellenthal
Mobile: +1 (616) 953-0176
jhellent...@dataix.net
JJH48-ARIN
On Oct 12, 2014, at 01:15, Adrian Chadd wrote:
It was for a while in 9.2, but we removed it from 10.0 and later due to
stability issues we kept getting reports about. Haven't tried it since then,
dont know if those issues are fixed.
On Oct 12, 2014, 2:15 AM, at 2:15 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>... is it enabled by default on pcbsd?
>
>
>-a
Hello,
it's been a while since I tested VIMAGE, but at the last time somewhere
in 10-CURRENT some UMA memory leaks were left when destroying vnets.
They weren't showstoppers for most workloads, but pretty anoying...
Have those been fixed?
Regards,
Yamagi
On Sat, 11 Oct 2014 10:58:13 -0700
Craig
On 12 Oct 2014, at 16:25 , Yamagi Burmeister wrote:
> Hello,
> it's been a while since I tested VIMAGE, but at the last time somewhere
> in 10-CURRENT some UMA memory leaks were left when destroying vnets.
> They weren't showstoppers for most workloads, but pretty anoying...
> Have those been f
In message <543a4244.1000...@freebsd.org>,
Matthew Seaman wrote:
>On 12/10/2014 02:05, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>...
>> /var/named/var/run/named/session.key
>>
>> So, um, how come? The default location wasn't good enough?
>
>You're running chrooted to /var/named. All paths will have /va
On Oct 12, 2014 9:39 AM, "Bjoern A. Zeeb"
wrote:
>
> No, an old perforce branch of mine had all but the last TCP ones fixed.
The code is still there.
>
Can you provide a pointer to your Perforce branch?
--
Craig
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
For me pf is working pretty nice on the host, it's only on the jails that it
can creates all kinds of trouble , but on the host I've not seen issues so far,
in both freebsd 9 and 10. Have not tested in current though.
On 12 October 2014 12:28:06 WEST, Jason Hellenthal
wrote:
>Should also add
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194314
Adrian Chadd changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||adr...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #2 f
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 5:33 AM, Allan Jude wrote:
> On 2014-10-12 07:28, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> > Should also add here that for those using PF as a firewall that VIMAGE
> enabled kernels don't play to well together Unless you like looking at
> cores all day.
> >
>
> There have been patche
To view an individual PR, use:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users,
which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering
all versions including experimental development code and ob
On 12 Oct 2014, at 18:19 , Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> On Oct 12, 2014 9:39 AM, "Bjoern A. Zeeb"
> wrote:
>>
>> No, an old perforce branch of mine had all but the last TCP ones fixed.
> The code is still there.
>>
>
> Can you provide a pointer to your Perforce branch?
//depot/user/bz/vimage/sr
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194314
--- Comment #3 from Garrett Cooper ---
(In reply to Adrian Chadd from comment #2)
> Hi!
>
> Does he/Isilon have a patch to fix/address this?
We don't yet. This was a recently discovered issue on a driver that isn't
available in HEAD yet..
On 10/12/14, 1:55 PM, wishmaster wrote:
--- Original message ---
From: "Alexander V. Chernikov"
Date: 11 October 2014, 23:20:39
On 11 Oct 2014, at 21:58, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
Hi,
What action items are left to enable VIMAGE by default for FreeBSD 11?
Are there any tests
15 matches
Mail list logo
