Hi,
I tested my scenario. it is true. I could not receive packets in receiver
and thought that my scenario is wrong!!
My problem in this test solved by using latest version of netmap and
netmap-based ipfw.
Thanks from Luigi for his great work.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.10
On 12 May 2014, at 03:45, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote:
> On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 04:22:36PM +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote:
>>
>> On 09 May 2014, at 12:46, Michael Tuexen
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 09 May 2014, at 03:35, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote:
>>>
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 08:40:22PM +0200, Michael Tuexen
Hi all,
Today I discovered a likely problem:
# ipfw table 99 add 0.0.0.0/8
# ipfw table 99 list
::/8 0
Is this correct? IPv6?
# uname -a
FreeBSD mail.xx.com.br 10.0-STABLE FreeBSD 10.0-STABLE #6 r265408:
Fri May 9 12:00:40 BRT 2014
r...@mail.xx.com.br:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GONDIM a
Cute. Same this happen when there are paren around the quad ?
--
Jason Hellenthal
Voice: 95.30.17.6/616
JJH48-ARIN
> On May 12, 2014, at 13:43, Marcelo Gondim wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today I discovered a likely problem:
>
> # ipfw table 99 add 0.0.0.0/8
>
> # ipfw table 99 list
> ::/8 0
>
Hi Jason,
Same problem.
Em 12/05/14 15:02, Jason Hellenthal escreveu:
Cute. Same this happen when there are paren around the quad ?
-- Jason Hellenthal Voice: 95.30.17.6/616 JJH48-ARIN
On May 12, 2014, at 13:43, Marcelo Gondim wrote:
Hi all,
Today I discovered a likely problem:
# ipfw t
I originaly posted this to virtualization@ list week ago. I didn't
recieved any answer, so maybe this list is better for questions like the
following.
I would like to ask some really experienced person - what is the best
way to run virtual guests connected to network with public IPs?
I think
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Nick Rogers wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am hoping someone can help me debug a kernel panic I have been experiencing
> on one of my production systems. The system is a PF+ALTQ firewall/gateway with
> about 1k simultaneous devices behind it at any given time, pushing no mor
Nick,
I'm very busy with some critical internal deadlines, I will look at this
when I can
come up for air, but please be patient.
Jack
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Nick Rogers wrote:
> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Nick Rogers wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am hoping someone can help me
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> Nick,
>
> I'm very busy with some critical internal deadlines, I will look at this
> when I can
> come up for air, but please be patient.
Thank you.
>
> Jack
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Nick Rogers wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 2, 201
Old Synopsis: Wake on Lan (WOL) enabled for Intel 82562EZ ethernet adapter, but
WOL does not work
New Synopsis: [fxp] Wake on Lan (WOL) enabled for Intel 82562EZ ethernet
adapter, but WOL does not work
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Respons
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 01:22:03PM +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote:
> On 12 May 2014, at 03:36, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 12:46:48PM +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote:
> >> On 09 May 2014, at 03:35, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote:
> >>
[...]
> > Oops, sorry. You're right. Probably I wa
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 01:09:18PM +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote:
> On 12 May 2014, at 06:38, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 12:33:24PM +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote:
> >> On 09 May 2014, at 03:47, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 08:50:48PM +0200, Micha
12 matches
Mail list logo