amd(8) doesn't work in 10 and CURRENT (does auromound(8) support NFS?)

Hello, Freebsd-net. I'm trying to use amd(8) with default config & map for "classic" task: access NFS shares without explicit "mount" commands (which need "sudo"). And it seems, that amd(8) is completely broken. It dumps core after 1-2 minutes of working with amd-mounted share (and NFS client c

Re: amd(8) doesn't work in 10 and CURRENT (does auromound(8) support NFS?)

Wiadomość napisana przez Lev Serebryakov w dniu 18 kwi 2014, o godz. 17:12: > Hello, Freebsd-net. > > I'm trying to use amd(8) with default config & map for "classic" task: > access NFS shares without explicit "mount" commands (which need "sudo"). > > And it seems, that amd(8) is completely broke

Re: Solarflare LACP bug?

Hi, I can repeat the bug. I'll investigate and return with the patch to fix it. Thanks for the report and sorry for delay with reply, Andrew. On 04/16/2014 11:00 PM, aurfalien wrote: Hi, I’ve a Solarflare SFN5162F dual port 10Gb ethernet adapter. While the card works fine as individual ports

Re: amd(8) doesn't work in 10 and CURRENT (does auromound(8) support NFS?)

Hello, Edward. You wrote 19 апреля 2014 г., 1:59:08: >> Does new "automound(8)", which "compatible with its counterparts in OS X, >> Solaris, and Linux" support NFS? ETN> Well, it would be kind of pointless if it didn't, right? ;-) Why not? As far as I understand, removable storage (USB sticks,