RE: netmap: traffic distribution

2013-09-26 Thread Michio Honda
Hi, The handiest way to try flexible flow distribution is using Flow Director.I've confirmed that the patch posted to this list two years ago works with netmap/ixgbe.http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Adding-Flow-Director-sysctls-to-ixgbe-4-td4769489.html Cheers,- Michio > Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2

Re: netmap: traffic distribution

2013-09-26 Thread hiren panchasara
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:58 AM, Michio Honda wrote: > Hi, > > The handiest way to try flexible flow distribution is using Flow Director. > I've confirmed that the patch posted to this list two years ago works with > netmap/ixgbe. > > http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Adding-Flow-Director-sys

New: FreeBSD TCP stack inside NS3 simulations

2013-09-26 Thread grenville armitage
All, Hopefully of interest to this list (and apologies in advanced if you see this on multiple mailing lists). I'm please to announce the v0.1 release of our NS-3/NSC environment for doing network traffic simulations, using the actual FreeBSD TCP stack inside the simulations. The tool itself ha

Re: netmap: traffic distribution

2013-09-26 Thread chintu hetam
Hiren, https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/scaling.txt must read to understand nuances of each of this features. None of this techniques are used for mostly none other than performance reasons. Michio, personally i am interested to know performance results in netmap mode with RFS

Re: netmap: traffic distribution

2013-09-26 Thread hiren panchasara
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 2:27 PM, chintu hetam wrote: > Hiren, > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/scaling.txt must read > to understand nuances of each of this features. None of this techniques are > used for mostly none other than performance reasons. > Thanks for the link.