nfsv4 fails with kerberos

2013-09-07 Thread Martin Laabs
Hi, I set up a nfsv4 server with kerberos but when starting the nfs server on the arm (RBI-B) board I get the following error message and the first (managing part) of the nfs exits: "nfsd: can't register svc name" This error message is produced by the following code in /usr/src/sys/fs/nfsserver/

Re: nfsv4 fails with kerberos

2013-09-07 Thread Rick Macklem
Martin Laabs wrote: > Hi, > > I set up a nfsv4 server with kerberos but when starting the nfs > server on > the arm (RBI-B) board I get the following error message and the first > (managing part) of the nfs exits: > > "nfsd: can't register svc name" > > This error message is produced by the foll

Re: mbuf autotuning effect

2013-09-07 Thread hiren panchasara
On Sep 6, 2013 8:26 PM, "Warner Losh" wrote: > > > On Sep 6, 2013, at 7:11 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > Yeah, why is VM_KMEM_SIZE only 12mbyte for MIPS? That's a little low for a > > platform that has a direct map that's slightly larger than 12mb :) > > > > Warner? Juli? > > All architectures hav

Re: mbuf autotuning effect

2013-09-07 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 7 September 2013 12:21, hiren panchasara wrote: > > On Sep 6, 2013 8:26 PM, "Warner Losh" wrote: > > > > > > On Sep 6, 2013, at 7:11 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > > > Yeah, why is VM_KMEM_SIZE only 12mbyte for MIPS? That's a little low > for a > > > platform that has a direct map that's slight

Re: mbuf autotuning effect

2013-09-07 Thread Ian Lepore
On Sat, 2013-09-07 at 12:21 -0700, hiren panchasara wrote: > On Sep 6, 2013 8:26 PM, "Warner Losh" wrote: > > > > > > On Sep 6, 2013, at 7:11 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > > > Yeah, why is VM_KMEM_SIZE only 12mbyte for MIPS? That's a little > low > for a > > > platform that has a direct map that's

Re: mbuf autotuning effect

2013-09-07 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 7 September 2013 12:56, Ian Lepore wrote: > I think the part of this that strikes me as strange is calling 20% of > physical memory used for network buffers a "very low value". It seems > outrageously high to me. I'd be pissed if that much memory got wasted > on network buffers on one of o

Re: mbuf autotuning effect

2013-09-07 Thread hiren panchasara
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Sat, 2013-09-07 at 12:21 -0700, hiren panchasara wrote: > > On Sep 6, 2013 8:26 PM, "Warner Losh" wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Sep 6, 2013, at 7:11 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > > > > > Yeah, why is VM_KMEM_SIZE only 12mbyte for MIPS? That's

Re: mbuf autotuning effect

2013-09-07 Thread hiren panchasara
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 7 September 2013 12:56, Ian Lepore wrote: > > >> I think the part of this that strikes me as strange is calling 20% of >> physical memory used for network buffers a "very low value". It seems >> outrageously high to me. I'd be pissed i