Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
> Yes, I may want to keep the state in the memory store or pass the arguments
> through it, since the accumulator might not be enough.
You have access to a whole packet, why do you need to pass additional
arguments through the store? I'm worried about introducing tig
hello all,
i have a problem with dhcp server. i want to define network with mask 8 and
use all network address which are possible. i know it is strange but for
some experimental purpose, i want to do it.
this is my dhcpd.conf file:
subnet 192.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0
{
range 192.0.0.1 192.255.2
Sam,
> subnet 192.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0
I know it is not the answer to your question, but you are wrong in your
guess that 192.0.0.0/8 is all private IPs. Only 192.168.0.0/16 is.
I know that for certain because my own IP starts with 192.
If you want a full /8 private, you can only use 10.0.0.
thanks Olivier,
my problem is to know how define a network with mask 8 and dhcp server
works correctly with it! you know if i config my dhcpd.conf like below, i
have core dump either:
subnet 10.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0
{
range 10.0.0.1 10.255.255.254;
}
do you know how should i define my range
Sam,
> my problem is to know how define a network with mask 8 and dhcp server
> works correctly with it! you know if i config my dhcpd.conf like below, i
> have core dump either:
> subnet 10.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0
> {
> range 10.0.0.1 10.255.255.254;
> }
>
> do you know how should i define my
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Olivier Nicole wrote:
> Sam,
>
> > my problem is to know how define a network with mask 8 and dhcp server
> > works correctly with it! you know if i config my dhcpd.conf like below, i
> > have core dump either:
> > subnet 10.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0
> > {
> > r
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Olivier Nicole <
> olivier.nic...@cs.ait.ac.th> wrote:
>
>> Sam,
>>
>> > my problem is to know how define a network with mask 8 and dhcp server
>> > works correctly with it! you know if i config my dh
thanks Andreas, that's it!!!
you know i have user interface program for dhcp. users don't know how dhcp
works and just enter desired range in text box. i should handle all entered
ranges. in order to do that, i should know how dhcp works with all
different ranges and return errors if some ranges is
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 11:29 AM, s m wrote:
> thanks Andreas, that's it!!!
> you know i have user interface program for dhcp. users don't know how dhcp
> works and just enter desired range in text box. i should handle all entered
> ranges. in order to do that, i should know how dhcp works with al
On 05.08.2013 23:53, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 11:04:44PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 05.08.2013 19:36, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
...
[picking a post at random to reply in this thread]
tell whether or not we should bail out).
Ideally we don't want to have any locks in the RX
thanks for the explanations and for experimenting with the various
alternatives.
I started this thread just to understand whether
something was already in place, and to make sure that what I
do with netmap is not worse than the situation we have now.
I guess that while the best solution comes out
Synopsis: [igb] igb(4) fails to do polling(4)
State-Changed-From-To: patched->closed
State-Changed-By: markj
State-Changed-When: Wed Aug 7 01:42:49 UTC 2013
State-Changed-Why:
Submitter reported that they haven't had any problems since applying the
patch.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?
yes, i solved my problem.
thanks every body for your answers. it help me a lot.
SAM
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 11:29 AM, s m wrote:
>
>> thanks Andreas, that's it!!!
>> you know i have user interface program for dhcp. users don't know
13 matches
Mail list logo
