Hi all,
I've deleted the interface ip address from routing table and only keep the
network address. Nothing is behaving unusual afterwards. I think this
loopback ip address is added for better performance. My question is would I
get in to trouble by deleting these ip addresses from routing table o
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 4:27 AM, Joe Holden wrote:
> Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>
>> Off the top of my head I don't know of another OS that does this.
>>
>> But yes agreed changing that behavior would probably effect a lot of
>> people in a negative way at this point.
>>
>> Not to mention script bre
Hi all,
I was testing my pthread-netblbast (PR bin/179085) when I found a
problem with netstat counters (tested on 9-stable r252056).
netreceive (src/toots/tools/netrate) display this output:
542025 pps 43.362 Mbps - 271554 pkts in 0.500998393 ns
541562 pps 43.325 Mbps - 271323 pkts i
> What I've intended to do, as jason is mentioned too, is assigning IP
> address to the interface but not let it works until a proper time. As I
> understand there is not any way just set the interface down besides adding
> IP! Still, any other solution?
Tested on 8.4-STABLE:
ifconfig em0 10.2.3.
I used to run a setup with a D-Link DUB-E100 ver. B adapter on pfSense also
using it for a DCHP WAN connection. I had a similar issues. Every time I
unplugged
the DUB-E100 things would work smoothly again.
Now Im using the D-Link adapter on a 8.3-RELEASE and am still having
issues once
in a wh
Old Synopsis: System (9.1-p4) hangs on heavy ixgbe network traffic with
hw.ixgbe.num_queues=6
New Synopsis: [ixgbe] System (9.1-p4) hangs on heavy ixgbe network traffic with
hw.ixgbe.num_queues=6
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-C
