Re: kern/178116: [tcp] [panic] Kernel panic: general protection fault in tcp_do_segment

2013-05-01 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
The following reply was made to PR kern/178116; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Nate Denning Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/178116: [tcp] [panic] Kernel panic: general protection fault in tcp_do_segment Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 18:02:06 +0400 Nate, do y

Re: kern/178116: [tcp] [panic] Kernel panic: general protection fault in tcp_do_segment

2013-05-01 Thread Nate Denning
The following reply was made to PR kern/178116; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Nate Denning To: Gleb Smirnoff Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/178116: [tcp] [panic] Kernel panic: general protection fault in tcp_do_segment Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 09:26:04 -0600 On May 1, 2013, a

Re: kern/178116: [tcp] [panic] Kernel panic: general protection fault in tcp_do_segment

2013-05-01 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
The following reply was made to PR kern/178116; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Nate Denning Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/178116: [tcp] [panic] Kernel panic: general protection fault in tcp_do_segment Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 19:27:22 +0400 Nate, On Wed

Re: kern/178116: [tcp] [panic] Kernel panic: general protection fault in tcp_do_segment

2013-05-01 Thread Nate Denning
The following reply was made to PR kern/178116; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Nate Denning To: Gleb Smirnoff Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/178116: [tcp] [panic] Kernel panic: general protection fault in tcp_do_segment Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 09:32:08 -0600 On May 1, 2013, a

Re: Capture packets before kernel process

2013-05-01 Thread Barney Cordoba
--- On Tue, 4/30/13, w...@sourcearmory.com wrote: > From: w...@sourcearmory.com > Subject: Capture packets before kernel process > To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org > Date: Tuesday, April 30, 2013, 11:24 AM > Hi! > > I need some help, currently I'm working in a project where I > want to capture and

Seeing EINVAL from writev on 8.0 to a non-blocking socket even though the data seems to hit the wire

2013-05-01 Thread Richard Sharpe
Hi folks, I am checking to see if there are any known bugs with respect to this in FreeBSD 8.0. Situation is that Samba 3.6.6 uses writev to a non-blocking socket to get the SMB2 requests on the wire. Intermittently, we see the writev return EINVAL even though the data has gotten on the wire. Th

Re: Capture packets before kernel process

2013-05-01 Thread Julian Elischer
On 5/2/13 7:13 AM, Barney Cordoba wrote: --- On Tue, 4/30/13, w...@sourcearmory.com wrote: From: w...@sourcearmory.com Subject: Capture packets before kernel process To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Date: Tuesday, April 30, 2013, 11:24 AM Hi! I need some help, currently I'm working in a project w

Re: Seeing EINVAL from writev on 8.0 to a non-blocking socket even though the data seems to hit the wire

2013-05-01 Thread Alfred Perlstein
On 5/1/13 8:03 PM, Richard Sharpe wrote: > Hi folks, > > I am checking to see if there are any known bugs with respect to this > in FreeBSD 8.0. > > Situation is that Samba 3.6.6 uses writev to a non-blocking socket to > get the SMB2 requests on the wire. > > Intermittently, we see the writev retur

Re: Seeing EINVAL from writev on 8.0 to a non-blocking socket even though the data seems to hit the wire

2013-05-01 Thread Richard Sharpe
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > On 5/1/13 8:03 PM, Richard Sharpe wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> I am checking to see if there are any known bugs with respect to this >> in FreeBSD 8.0. >> >> Situation is that Samba 3.6.6 uses writev to a non-blocking socket to >> get the SMB2