Hello,
I am jean and very glad to know you from Google website .Checked your website
and maybe your customer need our products so
Write to you and talk about whether we could cooperate with each other in the
further .
we are the manufacturer of PCI Express 1G &10G Ethernet NIC Card(Server Adapt
Hi there!
Lately I've been investigating an issue that I would like to share, as I feel I
may have to attack it from a different end.
I have an ethernet interface from where I create a vlan. Once I set up the ip
address in the vlan I can ping correctly on both
sides. The issue arrives when I t
The following reply was made to PR kern/177456; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Gleb Smirnoff
To: HouYeFei&XiBoLiu
Cc: freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: misc/177456: An error of calculating TCP sequence number will
resault in the machine to restart
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 16:08:03
--- On Thu, 3/28/13, Nick Rogers wrote:
> From: Nick Rogers
> Subject: Re: igb and ALTQ in 9.1-rc3
> To: "Jack Vogel"
> Cc: "Barney Cordoba" , "Clement Hermann (nodens)"
> , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org"
> Date: Thursday, March 28, 2013, 9:29 PM
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Jack
> Vogel
--- On Fri, 3/29/13, Pablo Ribalta Lorenzo wrote:
> From: Pablo Ribalta Lorenzo
> Subject: vlan with modified MAC fails to communicate
> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Date: Friday, March 29, 2013, 7:53 AM
> Hi there!
>
> Lately I've been investigating an issue that I would like to
> share, as
On 03/29/2013 01:57 PM, Barney Cordoba wrote:
--- On Fri, 3/29/13, Pablo Ribalta Lorenzo wrote:
From: Pablo Ribalta Lorenzo
Subject: vlan with modified MAC fails to communicate
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Date: Friday, March 29, 2013, 7:53 AM
Hi there!
Lately I've been investigating an issu
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Pablo Ribalta Lorenzo
wrote:
> Thanks for your answer Barney,
>
> I'm going to extend a little bit the explanation of the issue as it may be
> too brief.
>
> First of all, ifconfig shows me this (mge being the NIC):
>
> mge1: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu
> 1500
>
On 29 March 2013 07:37, Ryan Stone wrote:
> From a quick glance at if_vlan.c, it doesn't do anything intelligent when
> you change its MAC address. I also don't know of any ethernet driver in
> FreeBSD that allows you to use multiple unicast MACs at once (I have some
> patches for ixgbe, but the
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] On
Behalf Of Barney Cordoba
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 5:51 AM
To: Jack Vogel; Nick Rogers
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Clement Hermann (nodens)
Subject: Re: igb and ALTQ in 9.1-rc3
--- On
--- On Fri, 3/29/13, Pieper, Jeffrey E wrote:
> From: Pieper, Jeffrey E
> Subject: RE: igb and ALTQ in 9.1-rc3
> To: "Barney Cordoba" , "Jack Vogel"
> , "Nick Rogers"
> Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" , "Clement Hermann
> (nodens)"
> Date: Friday, March 29, 2013, 11:45 AM
>
>
> -Origin
Barney,
Patches gratefully accepted.
Adrian
On 29 March 2013 08:54, Barney Cordoba wrote:
>
>
> --- On Fri, 3/29/13, Pieper, Jeffrey E wrote:
>
> > From: Pieper, Jeffrey E
> > Subject: RE: igb and ALTQ in 9.1-rc3
> > To: "Barney Cordoba" , "Jack Vogel" <
> jfvo...@gmail.com>, "Nick Roge
--- On Fri, 3/29/13, Pieper, Jeffrey E wrote:
> From: Pieper, Jeffrey E
> Subject: RE: igb and ALTQ in 9.1-rc3
> To: "Barney Cordoba" , "Jack Vogel"
> , "Nick Rogers"
> Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" , "Clement Hermann
> (nodens)"
> Date: Friday, March 29, 2013, 11:45 AM
>
>
> -Origin
Fortunately, Barney doesn't speak for me, or for Intel, and I've long ago
realized its pointless to
attempt anything like a fair conversation with him. The only thing he's
ever contributed is slander
and pseudo-critique... another poison thread I'm done with.
Jack
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 8:45 A
it needs a lot more than a patch. It needs to be completely re-thunk
--- On Fri, 3/29/13, Adrian Chadd wrote:
From: Adrian Chadd
Subject: Re: igb and ALTQ in 9.1-rc3
To: "Barney Cordoba"
Cc: "Jack Vogel" , "Nick Rogers" ,
"Jeffrey EPieper" , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org"
, "Clement Hermann (node
Comedy gold. It's been a while since I've seen this much idiocy from you,
Barney. Hopefully the rest of the mailing list will blackhole you, as I'm
about to, and we can all get back to real work.
Scott
On Mar 29, 2013, at 10:38 AM, Barney Cordoba wrote:
> it needs a lot more than a patch.
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> Fortunately, Barney doesn't speak for me, or for Intel, and I've long ago
> realized its pointless to
> attempt anything like a fair conversation with him. The only thing he's ever
> contributed is slander
> and pseudo-critique... another poison
On 29 March 2013 10:04, Nick Rogers wrote:
> Multiqueue or not, I would appreciate any help with this thread's
> original issue. Whether or not its the ideal thing to do, I cannot
> simply just replace the NICs with an em(4) variant, as I have hundreds
> of customers/systems already in productio
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> But the summary seems to be is that currently it is not possible to break
> a thread
> out of accept(2) (at least without resorting to signals).
>
This is a known problem for Java. Closing a socket that another thread is
block on is suppose
On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 14:30:59 PDT Carl Shapiro wrote:
>
> In other operating systems, such as Solaris and MacOS X, closing the
> descriptor causes blocked system calls to return with an error.
What happens if you select() on a socket and another thread
closes this socket? Ideally select() should
<
said:
> The patch includes a lot of drc2.patch and drc3.patch, so don't try
> and apply it to a patched kernel. Hopefully it will apply cleanly to
> vanilla sources.
> Tha patch has been minimally tested.
Well, it's taken a long time, but I was finally able to get some
testing. The user whos
20 matches
Mail list logo
