Re: Need NAT64 on FreeBSD

2013-03-20 Thread Alexander V. Chernikov
On 20.03.2013 04:54, Vladislav Prodan wrote: Prompt please what or how to implement NAT64 on Freebsd? Currently you can try to use net/tayga, it can serve for some purposes. ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman

Re: kern/177139: [igb] igb drops ethernet ports 2 and 3

2013-03-20 Thread linimon
Old Synopsis: igb drops ethernet ports 2 and 3 New Synopsis: [igb] igb drops ethernet ports 2 and 3 Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-amd64->freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Mar 21 00:04:05 UTC 2013 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to maintainer(s). http:

Re: kern/177139: [igb] igb drops ethernet ports 2 and 3

2013-03-20 Thread Vogel, Jack
The following reply was made to PR kern/177139; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Vogel, Jack" To: "bug-follo...@freebsd.org" , "da...@dr.eclipse.co.uk" Cc: Subject: Re: kern/177139: [igb] igb drops ethernet ports 2 and 3 Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 00:17:03 + --_000_BC1B13FD0226B047

Best way for an app to accept traffic on 30,000+ interfaces?

2013-03-20 Thread Mark D
(Hopefully this isn't too out-of-scope for this list..) I have an application in mind that I'd like to have accept/respond to UDP queries sent to perhaps 30K contiguous IP addresses (most likely IPV6 addresses because such ranges are easy to come by, but conceptually ipv4 as well). This would all

Re: Best way for an app to accept traffic on 30,000+ interfaces?

2013-03-20 Thread Mark D
On 20Mar13, Juli Mallett allegedly wrote: > Well, the easiest thing is to add 30k aliases to your Ethernet > interface (you may hit a limit, not sure) and then just listen on > INADDR_ANY (or the IP6 equivalent), assuming you don't mind listening > to other addresses you have configured as well. T