Guys,
based on your suggestions and submissions I've produced the following patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/ng_ether-renaming.diff
It's only compile-tested at the moment :)
but I'd like to get your opinion about the direction of the change(s).
I am going to really test the change very soon
Hello,
it looks good, for just interface renaming scope.
The problem of it is that you need to check if the ifnet pointer needs
updated as well.
For coming and going interfaces like vlans you would have to update some
pointers as well at least the ifnet one.
The complete patch would rather inclu
Gleb Smirnoff writes:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 08:24:36AM -0200, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> R> gleb...@freebsd.org writes:
> R>
> R> > Synopsis: [ng_ubt] [patch] Add vendor IDs for Broadcom USB
> R> > dongles (BCM20702)
> R> >
> R> > Responsible-Changed-From-To: glebius->rakuco
> R> > Respo
On Sunday 27 January 2013 14:15:53 Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> Gleb Smirnoff writes:
> > On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 08:24:36AM -0200, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> > R> gleb...@freebsd.org writes:
> > R>
> > R> > Synopsis: [ng_ubt] [patch] Add vendor IDs for Broadcom USB
> > R> > dongles (BCM2070
Hans Petter Selasky writes:
>> Hans, do you think it makes sense to MFC this to the other stable
>> branches? I don't have 7 and 8 systems at hand to test this patch, so
>> I'd like your feedback on the issue.
>
> Yes, 8 at least. Could try 7 too, but then you need to translate the patch
> into t
On Sunday 27 January 2013 19:29:48 Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> Hans Petter Selasky writes:
> >> Hans, do you think it makes sense to MFC this to the other stable
> >> branches? I don't have 7 and 8 systems at hand to test this patch, so
> >> I'd like your feedback on the issue.
> >
> > Yes, 8
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 06:09:50PM +0100, Christian Gusenbauer wrote:
> On Friday 25 January 2013 05:50:48 YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 01:30:43PM +0900, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 05:21:50PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, January 24, 2
I am investigating an issue where the ixgbe (82599) device is hung and
I think I have traced it to the driver not getting interrupts. I have
MSI/X enabled, with 2 rx/tx queues.
I am trying to understand this bit of code in the MSI/X setup:
if (ixgbe_enable_msix) {
ixgbe_c
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 10:39:53PM -0800, Vijay Singh wrote:
> I am investigating an issue where the ixgbe (82599) device is hung and
> I think I have traced it to the driver not getting interrupts. I have
> MSI/X enabled, with 2 rx/tx queues.
just curious, is this happening under behyve or also n
