--- On Fri, 1/18/13, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> From: Adrian Chadd
> Subject: Re: two problems in dev/e1000/if_lem.c::lem_handle_rxtx()
> To: "Barney Cordoba"
> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, "Luigi Rizzo"
> Date: Friday, January 18, 2013, 3:09 PM
> On 18 January 2013 06:30, Barney
> Cordoba
> wro
--- On Fri, 1/18/13, John Baldwin wrote:
> From: John Baldwin
> Subject: Re: two problems in dev/e1000/if_lem.c::lem_handle_rxtx()
> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Cc: "Barney Cordoba" , "Adrian Chadd"
> , "Luigi Rizzo"
> Date: Friday, January 18, 2013, 11:49 AM
> On Friday, January 18, 2013
On Saturday, January 19, 2013 10:47:30 AM Barney Cordoba wrote:
> --- On Fri, 1/18/13, John Baldwin wrote:
> > From: John Baldwin
> > Subject: Re: two problems in dev/e1000/if_lem.c::lem_handle_rxtx()
> > To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> > Cc: "Barney Cordoba" , "Adrian Chadd"
> > , "Luigi Rizzo" D
The current setsockopt() wrapper for the Linux ABI claims that Linux and
FreeBSD use the same values for TCP socket options. This is true for
TCP_NODELAY and TCP_MAXSEG but not for any other options. This patch adds a
mapping routine for TCP options similar to that used for other socket option
On 2013-Jan-17 14:38:06 -0500, "Stephen J. Kiernan" wrote:
>The patch also includes moving zlib.[ch] and zlibutil.h out of net and
>into sys/libkern (for the .c) and sys/sys (for the .h).
Good.
>It really doesn't make much sense for that code to live in net,
>especially when so many things whi
On 19 January 2013 08:14, John Baldwin wrote:
> However, I did describe an alternate setup where you can fix this. Part of
> the key is to get various NICs to share a single logical queue of tasks. You
> could simulate this now by having all the deferred tasks share a single
> taskqueue with a
Old Synopsis: epair and gif Devices On Bridge
New Synopsis: [epair] [gif] epair and gif Devices On Bridge
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Jan 20 01:48:18 UTC 2013
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer(s).
Old Synopsis: [patch] rnh_walktree_from makes unreasonable assumptions
New Synopsis: [net] [patch] rnh_walktree_from makes unreasonable assumptions
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Jan 20 01:53:40 UTC 2013
Responsi
Old Synopsis: [patch] rnh_walktree_from visits spurious nodes
New Synopsis: [net] [patch] rnh_walktree_from visits spurious nodes
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Jan 20 01:54:19 UTC 2013
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Old Synopsis: Interface routes are broken
New Synopsis: [route] Interface routes are broken
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Jan 20 01:56:52 UTC 2013
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer(s).
http://www.fre
The following reply was made to PR kern/172113; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: John Baldwin
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, egrosb...@rdtc.ru
Cc: j...@freebsd.org, George Neville-Neil
Subject: Re: kern/172113: [panic] [e1000] [patch] 9.1-RC1/amd64 panices in
igb(4): m_getjcl: invalid cluster t
11 matches
Mail list logo
