Hi,
Here's the patch mostly from NetBSD to make socket(2) return EAFNOSUPPORT
rather than EPROTONOSUPPORT if the family cannot be found.
http://people.freebsd.org/~kevlo/patch-socket
The man page documents the behavior specified in POSIX.1-2008:
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/
Hello,
i was looking at ipfw dynamic code for dynamic states/rules and see that it
unconditionally schedules a callout even if there is not work to do.
Wouldn't it be best to reschedule it when there is something to do to avoid
having a useless
callout/event run every time on the system?
Is ther
On Tue, 4 Dec 2012, John Baldwin wrote:
Q2: Are there any case studies or benchmarks for buf_ring, or it is just
blindly being used because someone claimed it was better and offered it for
free? One of the points of locking is to avoid race conditions, so the
fact that you have races in a su
On Tue, 4 Dec 2012, Andre Oppermann wrote:
For most if not all ethernet drivers from 100Mbit/s the TX DMA rings are so
large that buffering at the IFQ level doesn't make sense anymore and only
adds latency. So it could simply directly put everything into the TX DMA
and not even try to soft-qu
On 06.12.2012 13:13, Ermal Luçi wrote:
Hello,
i was looking at ipfw dynamic code for dynamic states/rules and see that it
unconditionally schedules a callout even if there is not work to do.
Wouldn't it be best to reschedule it when there is something to do to avoid
having a useless
callout/eve
Kevin,
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 02:39:11PM +0800, Kevin Lo wrote:
K> Here's the patch mostly from NetBSD to make socket(2) return EAFNOSUPPORT
K> rather than EPROTONOSUPPORT if the family cannot be found.
K>
K> http://people.freebsd.org/~kevlo/patch-socket
K>
K> The man page documents the behav
--- On Thu, 12/6/12, Robert Watson wrote:
> From: Robert Watson
> Subject: Re: Latency issues with buf_ring
> To: "Andre Oppermann"
> Cc: "Barney Cordoba" , "Adrian Chadd"
> , "John Baldwin" ,
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Date: Thursday, December 6, 2012, 4:39 AM
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2012, Andre
There've been plenty of discussions about "better" ways of doing this
networking stuff.
Barney, are you able to make it to any of the developer summits?
adrian
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 02:39:11PM +0800, Kevin Lo wrote:
> K> Here's the patch mostly from NetBSD to make socket(2) return EAFNOSUPPORT
> K> rather than EPROTONOSUPPORT if the family cannot be found.
> K>
> K> http://people.freebsd.org/~kevlo/patch-socket
> K>
> K> The man page documents the b
