Re: misc/171838: Possible lock reversal and duplicate locks as reported by Witness

2012-11-06 Thread Venkat Duvvuru
The following reply was made to PR kern/171838; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Venkat Duvvuru To: freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org, freebsd-b...@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: misc/171838: Possible lock reversal and duplicate locks as reported by Witness Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 13:10:43 +0530

Re: splitting m_flags to pkthdr.flags + m_flags

2012-11-06 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hiya, On 2 November 2012 05:38, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > Hello networkers, > > some (most) of m_flags bits are describing features that can > be present on a packet only, not on a single mbuf. Since we are > close to exhaustion of available bits, and many subsystems prefer > to use one of M_PRO

Re: splitting m_flags to pkthdr.flags + m_flags

2012-11-06 Thread Andre Oppermann
On 06.11.2012 09:27, Adrian Chadd wrote: Hiya, On 2 November 2012 05:38, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: Hello networkers, some (most) of m_flags bits are describing features that can be present on a packet only, not on a single mbuf. Since we are close to exhaustion of available bits, and many su

6rd patch status

2012-11-06 Thread Seth Mos
Hello, The pfSense project uses the 6rd patch against the stf interface, which works but does not work with prefix lengths larger then 32 bits. What is the status of this work? As it is we can not support 6rd networks that deploy a 41 bit prefix length with a 15 bit ipv4 mask for a /56 deleg

NG nodes on cisco-style vlan interfaces

2012-11-06 Thread Nikolay Nevzorov
Create vlan interface in cisco-style, eg vlan 3 on fxp0 is fxp0.3, but in ngctl list i can't find node named fxp0.3. But i can see new ethernet node What cause this problem? Dot in the name of interface? How can i rename unnamed node to use it? -- Nikolay Nevzorov __

Re: kern/152036: [libc] getifaddrs(3) returns truncated sockaddrs for netmasks

2012-11-06 Thread Nicholas Wilson
The following reply was made to PR kern/152036; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Nicholas Wilson To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, kby...@gmail.com Cc: Subject: Re: kern/152036: [libc] getifaddrs(3) returns truncated sockaddrs for netmasks Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 12:19:08 + Note that althoug

Re: NG nodes on cisco-style vlan interfaces

2012-11-06 Thread Ryan Stone
Unfortunately netgraph doesn't allow dots in node names (or hook names), because that would cause an ambiguity in parsing netgraph paths. You can name an unnamed node by running "ngctl [nodeid]: name", but of course the name must be both valid and unique. On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 5:48 AM, Nikolay

Re: NG nodes on cisco-style vlan interfaces

2012-11-06 Thread Nikolay Denev
On Nov 6, 2012, at 12:48 PM, Nikolay Nevzorov wrote: > Create vlan interface in cisco-style, eg vlan 3 on fxp0 is fxp0.3, but in > ngctl list i can't find node named fxp0.3. But i can see new > ethernet node > What cause this problem? Dot in the name of interface? How can i rename > unnamed nod