Old Synopsis: Missing / broken ixgbe sysctl's and tunables (patch included)
New Synopsis: [ixgbe] [patch] Missing / broken ixgbe sysctl's and tunables
(patch included)
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Oct 30 07:29
Old Synopsis: data type size problem in if_spppsubr.c
New Synopsis: [patch] data type size problem in if_spppsubr.c
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Oct 30 15:10:40 UTC 2012
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to mainta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am trying to get if_lagg working in an HP blade for failover between
the 2 in chassis cisco switches, but it would seem that the link state
is not being propagated up to the lagg device.
Any hints/ideas?
dmesg:
bxe1: metric 0
mtu 1500
options=
On 10/30/12 11:23, Tom Judge wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am trying to get if_lagg working in an HP blade for failover between
the 2 in chassis cisco switches, but it would seem that the link state
is not being propagated up to the lagg device.
Any hints/ideas?
dm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30/10/2012 12:12, Adam McDougall wrote:
> On 10/30/12 11:23, Tom Judge wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>>
>>
>> I am trying to get if_lagg working in an HP blade for failover
>> between the 2 in chassis cisco switches,
On Oct 30, 2012, at 9:45 AM, Tom Judge wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 30/10/2012 12:12, Adam McDougall wrote:
>> On 10/30/12 11:23, Tom Judge wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I am trying to get if_lagg working in an HP b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30/10/2012 12:51, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Oct 30, 2012, at 9:45 AM, Tom Judge wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 30/10/2012 12:12, Adam McDougall wrote:
>>> On 10/30/12 11:23, Tom Judge wrote:
-BEGIN PG
Halloween Sale - GET 15% OFF
USE COUPON CODE "HALL" Brand New | You Asked for it You Got it ! | 100%
Targetted Followers
FaceBook Likes | YouTube Views | Twitter Followers
: http://promogoons.com/?product=new-100-targeted-followers 100% Targeted
Followers : http://promogoons.com/?product=new-10
So I cheaped out for now and just wrapped the ath TX path in a new TX only lock.
I'm open to other suggestions about how to make the "queue everything
through a taskqueue" work, but unfortunately it seems that I'm
defeated by the inner workings of the network stack locking and how
that plays with