Hi!
I just noticed that it is my default route that is changing for the
aforementioned in the subject IP address. What the "$?% could cause that? Could
MPD push that route as default? For what reason? That IP address doesn't even
belong to us.
--
-Message d'origine-
De : Gleb Smirn
W dniu 2012-09-11 15:19, Dominic Blais pisze:
Hi!
I just noticed that it is my default route that is changing for the aforementioned
in the subject IP address. What the "$?% could cause that? Could MPD push that
route as default? For what reason? That IP address doesn't even belong to us.
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 09:19:59AM -0400, Dominic Blais wrote:
D> Hi!
D>
D> I just noticed that it is my default route that is changing for the
aforementioned in the subject IP address. What the "$?% could cause that? Could
MPD push that route as default? For what reason? That IP address doesn't
I could do something about the route monitor but not the fstat | grep route...
I mean, I would have to run it in a loop endlessly until the bug happens...
Even with it, it's not even sure I would catch it...
Is there some way we can fstat everything so I don't miss what's happening
between 2 ca
On 11 September 2012 09:01, Dominic Blais wrote:
> I could do something about the route monitor but not the fstat | grep
> route... I mean, I would have to run it in a loop endlessly until the bug
> happens... Even with it, it's not even sure I would catch it...
The route monitor is a good idea
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 11 September 2012 09:01, Dominic Blais wrote:
>> I could do something about the route monitor but not the fstat | grep
>> route... I mean, I would have to run it in a loop endlessly until the bug
>> happens... Even with it, it's not eve
Ok, I'll try the route monitor. Please note that Krzysztof Barcikowski already
did it and got nothing:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2012-March/031879.html
--
-Message d'origine-
De : adrian.ch...@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.ch...@gmail.com] De la part de
Adrian Chadd
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:35:25AM -0700, Vijay Singh wrote:
V> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
V> > On 11 September 2012 09:01, Dominic Blais wrote:
V> >> I could do something about the route monitor but not the fstat | grep
route... I mean, I would have to run it in a loo
The following reply was made to PR kern/171524; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Sean Bruno
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, dhoj...@brainbits.net
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/171524: [ipmi] ipmi driver crashes kernel by reboot or
shutdown
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 12:56:16 -0700
It looks like the fix i
> V>
> V> Could this be
> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/netinet/in.c?r1=226120&r2=226224&pathrev=226331
>
> Why do you suspect this one?
I was hitting a similar issue in 8.2. After down/up on the interface
to the default gateway, I saw this message and arpresolve would never
complete. I
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 01:03:56PM -0700, Vijay Singh wrote:
V> > V>
V> > V> Could this be
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/netinet/in.c?r1=226120&r2=226224&pathrev=226331
V> >
V> > Why do you suspect this one?
V>
V> I was hitting a similar issue in 8.2. After down/up on the interface
V> t
Well, there definitely seems to be a problem with igb and lagg.
igb alone works as it should, but doesn't seem to work properly in lagg.
To be sure I started from scratch from a 9.0 release with nothing but:
/etc/rc.conf
---
ifconfig_igb0="inet ..
On Sep 11, 2012 2:12 PM, "Giulio Ferro" wrote:
>
> Well, there definitely seems to be a problem with igb and lagg.
>
> igb alone works as it should, but doesn't seem to work properly in lagg.
>
> To be sure I started from scratch from a 9.0 release with nothing but:
>
> /etc/rc.conf
>
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Giulio Ferro wrote:
Well, there definitely seems to be a problem with igb and lagg.
igb alone works as it should, but doesn't seem to work properly in lagg.
To be sure I started from scratch from a 9.0 release with nothing but:
/etc/rc.conf
---
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Sep 11, 2012 2:12 PM, "Giulio Ferro" wrote:
cloned_interfaces="lagg0"
ifconfig_lagg0="laggproto lacp laggport igb1 laggport igb2 laggport igb3
192.168.x.x/24"
sshd_enable="YES"
---
This doesn't eve
Your email program does not support HTML. To view an online version of this
email, please click the link below.
http://a.eb04.executivemailingservices.com/new/en_send_preview_iframe2.aspx?SID=1&NewsletterID=1182759&SiteID=205248&EmailID=146747893&HitID=134747850&token=0e3934e1622a93ef448eb5c
On 07.09.2012 23:44, Jeremiah Lott wrote:
On Apr 27, 2012, at 2:07 AM, lini...@freebsd.org wrote:
Old Synopsis: sosend sometimes return EINVAL with TSO and VLAN on 82599 NIC New
Synopsis:
[netinet] [patch] sosend sometimes return EINVAL with TSO and VLAN on 82599 NIC
http://www.freebsd.org/
17 matches
Mail list logo
