On Tuesday, August 07, 2012 12:48:31 am a...@freebsd.org wrote:
> Synopsis: detaching of ethernet adapter with configured vlans leads to panic
>
> Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
> Responsible-Changed-By: ae
> Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Aug 7 04:48:17 UTC 2012
> Responsib
Hi!
This is still the problem for 9.1-PRERELEASE: ng_source is unusable for 64bit
systems.
The patch really helps and fixes the problem for 64bit (and breaks for 32bit :-)
Perhaps, it may be improved with some #ifdef's
Eugene Grosbein
___
freebsd-net@
The following reply was made to PR kern/120304; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Eugene Grosbein
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, "n...@freebsd.org"
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/120304: [netgraph] [patch] netgraph source assumes 32-bit
timeval on AMD64
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 19:38:08 +0700
Hi!
Th
Hi!
I'd like to run some stability tests for some L2-transparent
gigabit ethernet network hardware I've got.
I have one spare FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE with two-ports igb(4) card
and connected both ports using my L2 hardward making a loop.
Is it possible to configure FreeBSD in such way so it would
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'd like to run some stability tests for some L2-transparent
> gigabit ethernet network hardware I've got.
>
> I have one spare FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE with two-ports igb(4) card
> and connected both ports using my L2 hardward making
On Tuesday 07 August 2012 16:04:17 Jacques Fourie wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I'd like to run some stability tests for some L2-transparent
> > gigabit ethernet network hardware I've got.
> >
> > I have one spare FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE with two-po
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 08:53:52PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'd like to run some stability tests for some L2-transparent
> gigabit ethernet network hardware I've got.
>
> I have one spare FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE with two-ports igb(4) card
> and connected both ports using my L2 hardw
Thanks for the reply... Sorry for the delay..
10gb0 - 192.168.33.0/24
10gb1 - 192.168.32.0/24
igb0 - 152.x.x.x/24
igb3 - 192.168.34.0/24
all routed out through 152.x.x.254 gateway
rc.conf (attempted, hangs on boot):
hostname="fqdn (resolvable)"
ifconfig_igb3="inet 192.168.34.2 netmask 255.255.2
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 04:33:11PM +0200, Marko Zec wrote:
> There's no need to use epair at all here. Just create a vnet jail, and
> assign
> one of the igb interfaces into it, done:
>
> # jail -c name=x vnet persist
> # ifconfig igb1 vnet x
> # jexec x ifconfig
> lo0: flags=8008 metric 0 mtu
On Tuesday 07 August 2012 18:20:28 Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 04:33:11PM +0200, Marko Zec wrote:
> > There's no need to use epair at all here. Just create a vnet jail, and
> > assign one of the igb interfaces into it, done:
> >
> > # jail -c name=x vnet persist
> > # ifconfig
10 matches
Mail list logo