Re: GIF tunnel doesnt like fragmented packets?

2012-07-11 Thread Ermal Luçi
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 4:27 AM, Chris Benesch wrote: > So I'm trying to set up a tunnel with Hurricane Electric.  Works great on > OpenBSD BTW, took only a minute or two. > There is no support for fragmented ipv6 packets in pf(4) for FreeBSD. > So heres rc.conf > > ipv6_gateway_enable="YES" > gi

Re: GIF tunnel doesnt like fragmented packets?

2012-07-11 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On 11. Jul 2012, at 07:14 , Ermal Luçi wrote: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 4:27 AM, Chris Benesch > wrote: >> So I'm trying to set up a tunnel with Hurricane Electric. Works great on >> OpenBSD BTW, took only a minute or two. >> > There is no support for fragmented ipv6 packets in pf(4) for Free

Re: GIF tunnel doesnt like fragmented packets?

2012-07-11 Thread Daniel Hartmeier
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 07:27:04PM -0700, Chris Benesch wrote: > The only thing I notice is that the ones coming from HE have the DF flag > set? Am I on the wrong path? Have no idea how to get this to work. The problem isn't fragmentation (those DF packets are not large enough to require fragme

VNET and IPv6 multicast routing

2012-07-11 Thread Hartmut Brandt
Is $subj supposed to work in -current? When I set MFC entries in a second jails the ones installed from the first jail get destroyed or mixed up. harti ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To

Re: GIF tunnel doesnt like fragmented packets?

2012-07-11 Thread Chris Benesch
OMG I am so stupid gifconfig_gif0="192.168.0.2 64.62.134.130" << works gifconfig_gif0="198.168.0.2 64.62.134.130" << what it was before, doesnt work Sorry to waste everyones time ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman

RE: lacp lagg port flags do not show correctly resulting in poor traffic distribution/performance

2012-07-11 Thread Adarsh Joshi
I tried to configure lagg with the latest source from SVN head and it did not help. Regards Adarsh -Original Message- From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Adarsh Joshi Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 10:53 AM To: Andrew Boyer Cc: freebsd-n

Interface MTU question...

2012-07-11 Thread gnn
Howdy, Does anyone know the reason for this particular check in ip_output.c? if (rte != NULL && (rte->rt_flags & (RTF_UP|RTF_HOST))) { /* * This case can happen if the user changed the MTU * of an interface after enabling IP on it. Becaus

Re: Interface MTU question...

2012-07-11 Thread Navdeep Parhar
On 07/11/12 14:30, g...@freebsd.org wrote: Howdy, Does anyone know the reason for this particular check in ip_output.c? if (rte != NULL && (rte->rt_flags & (RTF_UP|RTF_HOST))) { /* * This case can happen if the user changed the MTU * of

Re: ating 100Gbit transfer rate

2012-07-11 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Sami Halabi wrote: > Hi, > > We have several boxes using 10G cards and using most of the bandwidth. > as a future vision i would like to ask if someone ever combined hardware > with freebsd/linux to saturate 100Gbit of traffic. > what hardware (server, NICs, platfo

Re: ating 100Gbit transfer rate

2012-07-11 Thread Sami Halabi
Hi, Thank your for your response. i have 2 questions: 1. can you explain the looping method that allowed you to reach 100GB ? 2. Alcatel-Lucent is routers are givven for research internationally ? or its locally? what routers we are talking about here and what link do they have? i appreciatre if y