On 07/03/2012 23:29, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
> On 04.07.2012 01:29, Doug Barton wrote:
Just curious ... what's the MTU on your FreeBSD box, and the Linux box?
>
> In this particular setup - 1500. You're probably meaning type of mbufs
> which are allocated by ixgbe driver?
1500 for both?
On 04.07.2012 12:13, Doug Barton wrote:
On 07/03/2012 23:29, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
On 04.07.2012 01:29, Doug Barton wrote:
Just curious ... what's the MTU on your FreeBSD box, and the Linux box?
In this particular setup - 1500. You're probably meaning type of mbufs
which are allocated
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 12:46:09PM +0400, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
> On 04.07.2012 12:13, Doug Barton wrote:
> >On 07/03/2012 23:29, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
> >>On 04.07.2012 01:29, Doug Barton wrote:
> >Just curious ... what's the MTU on your FreeBSD box, and the Linux box?
> >>
> >
On 04.07.2012 13:12, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
Alex,
i am sure you are aware that in FreeBSD we have netmap too
Yes, I'm aware of that :)
which is probably a lot more usable than packetshader
(hw independent, included in the OS, also works on linux...)
I'm actually not talking about usability and com
i have sever with two 1G links (em) aggregated by lagg0
after 1700Megabits i have collisions/errors on lagg0 port, but not on em0
or em1
I'm using nginx in own CDN. and server don't limited my mbufs, irq, or
anything else.. only lagg0 errors (
netstat -w 1 -I em0
input (em0)
On 7/4/12 1:30 PM, Vyacheslav Kulikovskyy wrote:
> i have sever with two 1G links (em) aggregated by lagg0
>
> after 1700Megabits i have collisions/errors on lagg0 port, but not on em0
> or em1
>
> I'm using nginx in own CDN. and server don't limited my mbufs, irq, or
> anything else.. only lagg0
>Do the ports on the switch report any layer 2 error, by chance ?
I don't have access to swith, but without lagg0 i have near 980Mbit's
on one em0 network link.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ne
Hi all,
I have a problem using ipfw firewall. I have a topology connected as below:
A(192.168.1.55) - (192.168.1.1)my_sys(192.168.2.1)
---(192.168.2.12)B
I've set the rule "ipfw add 1 deny icmp from any to any" on my_sys, which
works correctly. I can't ping from A to B by the rule. Then
Hi all.
I want to config FreeBSD as a dns server. I did below configuration but
when I use "nslookup" command it doesn't work. I also enabled named service
in rc.conf file and put my ip as a nameserver in "resolv.conf".
what am I missing?is there anything else I should do?
any help would be appric
On 04.07.2012 17:04, h bagade wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a problem using ipfw firewall. I have a topology connected as below:
>
> A(192.168.1.55) - (192.168.1.1)my_sys(192.168.2.1)
> ---(192.168.2.12)B
>
> I've set the rule "ipfw add 1 deny icmp from any to any" on my_sys, which
> works
Have you set net.link.ether.ipfw?
~Paul
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 05:34:04PM +0430, h bagade wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a problem using ipfw firewall. I have a topology connected as below:
>
> A(192.168.1.55) - (192.168.1.1)my_sys(192.168.2.1)
> ---(192.168.2.12)B
>
> I've set the rule "ip
- What bind listening? (Can you see it with netstat?)
- What port is it listening to?
- What errors (if any) are in the error log?
I'm afraid your question really isn't a specific FreeBSD problem.
You might have better luck on the BIND mailing list.
~Paul
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 06:43:00AM -070
Good day to all.
What is the correct way to distinguish udp packets that obtained by
application and were send on 255.255.255.255 ip addr from those that
were send to unicast ip?
Seems it is impossible with read/recvfrom so we'v made that with
libpcap. It coul be done with directly bpf api w
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 01:54:01PM +0400, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
> On 04.07.2012 13:12, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> >Alex,
> >i am sure you are aware that in FreeBSD we have netmap too
> Yes, I'm aware of that :)
>
> >which is probably a lot more usable than packetshader
> >(hw independent, includ
On Jul 4, 2012, at 6:08 PM, Budnev Vladimir wrote:
> Good day to all.
>
> What is the correct way to distinguish udp packets that obtained by
> application and were send on 255.255.255.255 ip addr from those that were
> send to unicast ip?
>
> Seems it is impossible with read/recvfrom so we'v
07/04/12 19:37, Nikolay Denev пишет:
On Jul 4, 2012, at 6:08 PM, Budnev Vladimir wrote:
Good day to all.
What is the correct way to distinguish udp packets that obtained by application
and were send on 255.255.255.255 ip addr from those that were send to unicast
ip?
Seems it is impossible w
An ifconfig -v lagg0 might be useful here
netstat -m and maybe more that others can advise on.
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 02:58:30PM +0300, Vyacheslav Kulikovskyy wrote:
> >Do the ports on the switch report any layer 2 error, by chance ?
>
> I don't have access to swith, but without lagg0 i have
Hello, Alexander.
You wrote 4 июля 2012 г., 12:46:09:
AVC> http://shader.kaist.edu/packetshader/ (and links there) are good example
AVC> of what is going on.
But HOW?! GPU has very high "preparation" and data transfer cost,
how it could be used for such small packets of data, as 1.5-9K
data
On 04.07.2012 23:37, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Alexander.
You wrote 4 июля 2012 г., 12:46:09:
AVC> http://shader.kaist.edu/packetshader/ (and links there) are good example
AVC> of what is going on.
But HOW?! GPU has very high "preparation" and data transfer cost,
how it could be use
On 4 July 2012 23:30, Vyacheslav Kulikovskyy wrote:
> i have sever with two 1G links (em) aggregated by lagg0
>
> after 1700Megabits i have collisions/errors on lagg0 port, but not on em0
> or em1
>
> I'm using nginx in own CDN. and server don't limited my mbufs, irq, or
> anything else.. only lag
On 07/04/2012 06:43, m s wrote:
> I want to config FreeBSD as a dns server.
You don't mention what kind of name server you want, but from the rest
of your post I'm assuming that you want a local resolver. If that's the
case, your best bet is to stick with all of the defaults in the base
currently,
04.07.2012 18:30, Vyacheslav Kulikovskyy пишет:
> i have sever with two 1G links (em) aggregated by lagg0
>
> after 1700Megabits i have collisions/errors on lagg0 port, but not on em0
> or em1
>
> I'm using nginx in own CDN. and server don't limited my mbufs, irq, or
> anything else.. only lagg0
22 matches
Mail list logo
