Note: to view an individual PR, use:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsolete releases.
S Tracker
On 6/15/2012 5:57 PM, Przemyslaw Frasunek wrote:
>> I suspect this isn't related to netgraph, but to IPv6 since prelist_remove()
>> is found in netinet6/nd6_rtr.c.
>>
>> Several times I looked into ND code and found lots of race prone code there.
>> May be some was recently fixed by bz@, but defini
>> Thanks a lot guys. For now, I disabled IPv6 on this BRAS. Let's see if it's
>> going to help.
> Hi,
> Any changes in stability ?
Hi,
It's way better now. I had no crash since IPv6 is disabled.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://li
add pipe 1 tcp from 147.28.2.129 to 147.28.2.133
add pipe 2 tcp from 147.28.2.133 to 147.28.2.129
pipe 1 config queue 50 delay 200ms
pipe 2 config queue 50 delay 200ms
is a tcp packet from 147.28.2.129 to 147.28.2.133 delayed by 200ms or
400ms, 200 for each interface?
randy
__
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 01:48:45AM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
> add pipe 1 tcp from 147.28.2.129 to 147.28.2.133
> add pipe 2 tcp from 147.28.2.133 to 147.28.2.129
> pipe 1 config queue 50 delay 200ms
> pipe 2 config queue 50 delay 200ms
>
> is a tcp packet from 147.28.2.129 to 147.28.2.133 delayed
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 01:48:45AM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
> add pipe 1 tcp from 147.28.2.129 to 147.28.2.133
> add pipe 2 tcp from 147.28.2.133 to 147.28.2.129
> pipe 1 config queue 50 delay 200ms
> pipe 2 config queue 50 delay 200ms
>
> is a tcp packet from 147.28.2.129 to 147.28.2.133 delayed
Hi,
Is it possible to get you to setup a test BRAS running 9-STABLE, so
you can provide feedback about how stable ipv4/ipv6 PPPoE is for you?
It's great that you've solved it for 7.x, and I know that bz and
others know about a variety of fun issues in the networking stack that
may be related to t
On 6/18/2012 6:51 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to get you to setup a test BRAS running 9-STABLE, so
> you can provide feedback about how stable ipv4/ipv6 PPPoE is for you?
I have another LNS to deploy soon and I can enable IPv6 and use RELENG9.
I have in the past been able to
