On Mon, 14 May 2012 16:02:40 +0300, Ivo Vachkov wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Monthadar Al Jaberi
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
> > > On 13 May 2012 06:46, Ivo Vachkov wrote:
> > >> Please define "working"? Porting? Kernel-
At Tue, 8 May 2012 12:11:20 +0200,
Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to ask a few question in order to get some hardware to work
> we've got recently.
>
> The hardwares are the following:
> - 2x dualport Mellanox ConnectX-3 VPI cards, with 56Gbps ports
> - 4 computing modules wit
Hi,
If you'd like this kind of userland wifi mesh stuff to show up, we
first need someone to step up as net80211 adhoc/injection maintainer.
These userland mesh implementations rely on direction injection of
wifi frames to work and I believe our support is currently 'tricky'.
It also isn't at al
Trying to use two interfaces connected to the same network with the same
default router. The two interfaces have two different IPs on the
same /28 and point at the same default router of .1. I have
successfully configured the machine such that data is coming *in* on
both interfaces, but the outpu
The route selection is based on a hash function of source-ip and destination-ip
when
RADIX_MPATH is enabled. You do not need to perform specific actions, other than
perhaps
setting varying weights on each entry as an option. So depends on the traffic
destination
the chosen route may always be
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 12:02 -0700, Li, Qing wrote:
> The route selection is based on a hash function of source-ip and
> destination-ip when
> RADIX_MPATH is enabled. You do not need to perform specific actions, other
> than perhaps
> setting varying weights on each entry as an option. So depen
Hello!
I am using FreeBSD-9-stable.
I use Intel network cards (em, igb) with mtu=9000 (it's important, the
problem disappears if I switch to mtu=1500).
I have a number of servers running a few web-services written in our
company.
After a few days of working network suddenly stops functionin
Li, Qing wrote:
>
> The route selection is based on a hash function of source-ip and
> destination-ip when RADIX_MPATH is enabled. You do not need to perform
> specific actions, other than perhaps setting varying weights on each
> entry as an option. So depends on the traffic destination the chose
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 12:55 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 12:02 -0700, Li, Qing wrote:
> > The route selection is based on a hash function of source-ip and
> > destination-ip when
> > RADIX_MPATH is enabled. You do not need to perform specific actions, other
> > than perhap
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 16:14 -0700, David DeSimone wrote:
> suggests that there is only ONE default route, pointing to ONE
> interface, igb0. Without an extra default route that is also pointing
> to igb1, I can't see how the system woudl ever forward traffic out
> igb1,
> unless it was directed to
Yes, you are right, I should have paid closer attention to the output, however,
what
I replied still apply to RADIX_MPATH in general.
Now, when I first introduced RADIX_MPATH, to get the (not always even) general
load
balancing among interfaces attached to the same prefix, you only need to add
Old Synopsis: arpresolve checks only the default FIB for the interface route
New Synopsis: [ipfw] arpresolve checks only the default FIB for the interface
route
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: gjb
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed May 16 03:57:09 UTC 201
Filed as
misc/167947
On May 12, 2012, at 10:21 AM, Nikolay Denev wrote:
> On Jan 21, 2010, at 6:16 PM, Matt Burke wrote:
>
>> Box is running 8.0-RELEASE-p2 cvsupped two days ago.
>>
>> NICs are em bonded with lagg failover and running a few vlan interfaces.
>>
>> net.my_fibnum: 0
>> net.add_
Folks,
This question is related to the hash calculation done as part of selecting
the transmit queue for IPv6 traffic.
I observed that no matter how many queues you use in the driver, the tx
traffic is always coming on queue 0.
Did anybody else observed this behaviour?
Note: IPv4 traffic is coming
14 matches
Mail list logo
