Re: [nfe] DHCP failure on 8-stable

On 04/02/2012 03:52 PM, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:40:44AM -0400, enoch wrote: >> On 03/30/2012 19:38, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 03:01:52AM -0400, enoch wrote: Recently it became extremely difficult to pass the DHCP discovery step on boot. N

SCTP-CMT in FreeBSD 9.0 Release

Hi, I'm using the FreeBSD8.2 to research CMT-SCTP. I use the same code in FreeBSD8.2, it could see the ESTABLISHED. But in FreeBSD 9.0, the status show the CLOSED. I try to capture the packet by tcpdump, there is nothing wrong compare in FreeBSD8.2. In FreeBSD9.0, the connection will ABORT direct

Re: (no subject)

>> Why on earth would you do that when configuring the LAgg does this for you...! ALSO! you do not need an address on either of the nics!. That should be placed explicitly on the LAgg and add a alias for each sub address you would like.<< Incorrect! Try adding failover on 2 NIC's, leaving it up to

Re: lagg problems on diskless client

Hi, Peter. I had looked into failover with wireless and tried it before posting, but got nowhere. I delayed posting an answer because I needed to do more fiddleing; and I made some headwy, but still problems: 1. With below setup in diskless client's rc.conf, the client is able to boot and gets to

Re: (no subject)

Discussion continued here, please: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2012-April/031904.html ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr.

Re: SCTP-CMT in FreeBSD 9.0 Release

On Apr 2, 2012, at 10:59 AM, ColinChu wrote: > Hi, > I'm using the FreeBSD8.2 to research CMT-SCTP. > I use the same code in FreeBSD8.2, it could see the ESTABLISHED. > But in FreeBSD 9.0, the status show the CLOSED. > I try to capture the packet by tcpdump, there is nothing wrong compare in > Fr

Re: [nfe] DHCP failure on 8-stable

On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 03:50:02AM -0400, enoch wrote: > On 04/02/2012 03:52 PM, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:40:44AM -0400, enoch wrote: > >> On 03/30/2012 19:38, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > >>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 03:01:52AM -0400, enoch wrote: > Recently it became ex

Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org

Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker

Re: Malformed syn packet cause %100 cpu and interrupts FreeBSD 9.0 release

On Mar 22, 2012, at 5:30 AM, Seyit Özgür wrote: > I solve the problem myself. > Thanks anyway For the records*, what'd you do? > Best regards. > > Seyit Özgür > Network Yöneticisi > *: http://xkcd.com/979/ ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list

RE: Malformed syn packet cause %100 cpu and interrupts FreeBSD 9.0 release

it was fragmented packets.. i set up "net.inet.ip.fragpackets=0" there is no more fragmented packets.. This is not a solution for all systems.. Just i don't need fragmented packets.. that was stuck my ethernet card while flooding.. Everything works fine atm. Seyit Özgür Network Yöneticisi -O

Re: LACP kernel panics: /* unlocking is safe here */

On Friday, March 30, 2012 6:04:24 pm Andrew Boyer wrote: > While investigating a LACP issue, I turned on LACP_DEBUG on a debug kernel. In this configuration it's easy to panic the kernel - just run 'ifconfig lagg0 laggproto lacp' on a lagg that's already in LACP mode and receiving LACP messages

RE: Removing an IPv6 address does not remove NDP entries on that subnet

> > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Li, Qing wrote: > >> * In a way this is a good thing as in6_lltable_prefix_free() is > >> guaranteed to crash your kernel in two different ways, and that's > not > >> counting the race conditions that it's subject to. > >> > > > >        Could you please elab

Re: [nfe] DHCP failure on 8-stable

YongHyeon PYUN writes: > On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 03:50:02AM -0400, enoch wrote: >> On 04/02/2012 03:52 PM, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: >> > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:40:44AM -0400, enoch wrote: >> >> On 03/30/2012 19:38, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 03:01:52AM -0400, enoch wrot

Re: [nfe] DHCP failure on 8-stable

On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 07:36:36PM -0400, enoch wrote: > YongHyeon PYUN writes: > > > On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 03:50:02AM -0400, enoch wrote: > >> On 04/02/2012 03:52 PM, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > >> > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:40:44AM -0400, enoch wrote: > >> >> On 03/30/2012 19:38, YongHyeon PYUN

Re: PXE Boot vmware 8.x fails after pxeboot.

Replying to my own message, I add more below... On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: > I have had diskless FreeBSD machines before.  I started this project > with an eye to booting iscsi disks, but there seems to be no way to > communicate the root disk path (and parameters) t

Re: [nfe] DHCP failure on 8-stable

YongHyeon PYUN writes: > On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 07:36:36PM -0400, enoch wrote: >> YongHyeon PYUN writes: >> >> > On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 03:50:02AM -0400, enoch wrote: >> >> On 04/02/2012 03:52 PM, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: >> >> > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:40:44AM -0400, enoch wrote: >> >> >> On

Re: [nfe] DHCP failure on 8-stable

On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 01:45:30AM -0400, enoch wrote: > YongHyeon PYUN writes: > > > On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 07:36:36PM -0400, enoch wrote: > >> YongHyeon PYUN writes: > >> > >> > On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 03:50:02AM -0400, enoch wrote: > >> >> On 04/02/2012 03:52 PM, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > >>