Re: Use of network_interfaces in rc.conf

14.03.2012 13:19, hiren panchasara пишет: > Thanks Chuck for getting back. I have a question inlined: > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote: > >> On Mar 13, 2012, at 10:18 PM, hiren panchasara wrote: What difference does it make when I have each (separately) in my >> rc.c

Re: if_bridge stops when running virtualbox 4.1.8

Hi, I also have this problem. My environment is below - FreeBSD-8.2-RELEASE/amd64 and FreeBSD-10-current/i386 - Virtualbox 4.0.14(now I'm compiling new version 4.1.8) - WI-FI HOSTAP mode(if_bridge) I hope to use both function(VirtualBox and if_bridge) at same. Please let us to know the

Re: if_bridge stops when running virtualbox 4.1.8

On 14.03.2012 13:59, MIHIRA Sanpei Yoshiro wrote: Hi, I also have this problem. My environment is below - FreeBSD-8.2-RELEASE/amd64 and FreeBSD-10-current/i386 - Virtualbox 4.0.14(now I'm compiling new version 4.1.8) - WI-FI HOSTAP mode(if_bridge) I hope to use both function(Virtua

Zero MAC address

Hello everyone, I assigned a 00:00:00:00:00:00 MAC address to one of my interfaces on a machine and tried to ping the peer machine. The ping did go through fine. I can the see the request and reply packets on the packet capture. I am wondering if that is legitimate and if not, who is supposed t

crash on lagg interface destroy

Hello everyone, I tried to destroy a lagg interface (created using laggproto none) and I see the system crash. Steps to reproduce: Kldload if_lagg Ifconfig lagg0 create ifconfig lagg0 up laggproto none laggport ql0 laggport ql1 192.168.100.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 ifconfig lagg0 destroy uname -

RE: Zero MAC address

Thank you for the quick replies. I am aware of the importance of the second bit. By invalid, I was wondering if that particular address is reserved or if it has any special meaning or purpose. So in theory, I cannot classify it as an invalid MAC address on my packet statistics utility. On a si

Re: Use of network_interfaces in rc.conf

On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 4:19 AM, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 14.03.2012 13:19, hiren panchasara пишет: > > Thanks Chuck for getting back. I have a question inlined: > > > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote: > > > >> On Mar 13, 2012, at 10:18 PM, hiren panchasara wrote: > Wh

Re: Zero MAC address

On Mar 14, 2012, at 3:32 PM, Adarsh Joshi wrote: > I assigned a 00:00:00:00:00:00 MAC address to one of my interfaces on a > machine and tried to ping the peer machine. The ping did go through fine. > > I can the see the request and reply packets on the packet capture. I am > wondering if that i

Re: Zero MAC address

On Mar 14, 2012, at 4:05 PM, Adarsh Joshi wrote: > Thank you for the quick replies. > > I am aware of the importance of the second bit. By invalid, I was wondering > if that particular address is reserved or if it has any special meaning or > purpose. There isn't a special meaning for all-zeros

Re: firewall stuck

thanks Kevin, this is my "ipfw show" : 00100 4352617 2413620288 allow ip from any to any via lo0 002000 0 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 003000 0 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any 004000 0 deny ip from any to ::1 005000 0 den

Re: firewall stuck

Please don't top post. It makes following the thread very difficult. (Yes, I know too many MUAs make this difficult.) > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote: >> >> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 7:27 PM, nyoman.b...@gmail.com >> wrote: >> > dear guru, >> > >> > every time I open my fir

Re: Use of network_interfaces in rc.conf

15.03.2012 06:33, hiren panchasara пишет: > network_interfaces is basically historic rudiment > used in 2.2.x FreeBSD version and alike. > > In general, you should not use it in modern version at all. > > > Thanks Eugene. > > So, the only way to specify boottime configuration (that