Use netgraph nodes.
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> n...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of h bagade
> Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2012 3:31 PM
> To: freebsd-net
> Subject: problem with vlan interfaces tagging/untagging in a simulated
> switch box
>
The following reply was made to PR kern/165643; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: dfil...@freebsd.org (dfilter service)
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/165643: commit references a PR
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 11:11:45 + (UTC)
Author: zec
Date: Sun Mar 4 11:11:03 2012
New
Hi,
I just noticed that when running Virtualbox 4.1.8 with a bridged network
interface, I loose connectivity to another virtual host running in qemu
whose network interface is bridged to my ethernet interface. After
stopping the Virtualbox instance, I regain connection to the virtual
host under q
# sysctl net.isr
net.isr.numthreads: 4
net.isr.maxprot: 16
net.isr.defaultqlimit: 256
net.isr.maxqlimit: 10240
net.isr.bindthreads: 0
net.isr.maxthreads: 4
net.isr.direct: 0
net.isr.direct_force: 0
and as you see in "netstat -Q"
>> Direct dispatch disabled n/a
>> Forced dir
Is this the correct mailer for such questions?
-- Forwarded message --
From: hiren panchasara
Date: Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 12:47 AM
Subject: bridge interface type
To: freebsd-hack...@freebsd.org
I created bridge1 this way:
$ sudo ifconfig bridge create
Password:
bridge1
$ ifconf
I've tried netgraph nodes too! but stuck on the next step and asked
the problem on this forum and received no answer:( my netgraph
scenario is described below:
I have designed a topology(attached) using netgraph to add vlan2
tag to the frames coming from eth0(vlan port) and send it to
eth1(trunk p
if you can not get the image, I've tried to draw text form here with commands:
##
[system 1]--#--[eth0]#
# |-- [hub0]--[vlan2] #
[system 2]
On 3/4/12 1:36 PM, hiren panchasara wrote:
Is this the correct mailer for such questions?
probably n...@freebsd.org would be better.
I do not understand why a bridge needs an interface type at all
it seems a very odd way to implement it to me.. see how ng_bridge is
done..
that makes a lot m
On 5 March 2012 18:46, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 3/4/12 1:36 PM, hiren panchasara wrote:
>>
>> Is this the correct mailer for such questions?
>
>
> probably n...@freebsd.org would be better.
>
> I do not understand why a bridge needs an interface type at all
> it seems a very odd way to implemen
> From: hiren panchasara
>
> I created bridge1 this way:
>
> $ sudo ifconfig bridge create
> Password:
> bridge1
>
> $ ifconfig bridge1
> bridge1: flags=8802 metric 0 mtu 1500
> ether 02:32:c8:92:b6:01
> nd6 options=29
> id 00:00:00:00:00:00 priority 32768 hellotime 2 fwddelay 15
> max
10 matches
Mail list logo