The following reply was made to PR kern/164400; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Eugene M. Zheganin"
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, eug...@zhegan.in
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/164400: [ipsec] immediate crash after the start of ipsec
processing
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 13:52:09 +0600
sorry for the
The following reply was made to PR kern/164400; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Andrew A. Khlebutin"
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, eug...@zhegan.in
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/164400: [ipsec] immediate crash after the start of ipsec
processing
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 16:54:23 +0600
Hello,
I ha
Patch is against 9-stable.
[pc20 /u/vijay/bsd/CODE/9s/sys]# svn diff net/if_ethersubr.c
Index: net/if_ethersubr.c
===
--- net/if_ethersubr.c (revision 232242)
+++ net/if_ethersubr.c (working copy)
@@ -661,8 +661,10 @@
and device drivers and other overheads
2. (eventually) build userspace versions of the firewall on top of
netmap or other accelerated I/O frameworks.
The tarball is at
http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/netmap/20120302-ipfw-user.tgz
The client side (ipfw/ipfw) talks to the former-kernel
Is the same problem in -HEAD?
Adrian
On 2 March 2012 10:28, Vijay Singh wrote:
> Patch is against 9-stable.
>
> [pc20 /u/vijay/bsd/CODE/9s/sys]# svn diff net/if_ethersubr.c
> Index: net/if_ethersubr.c
> ===
> --- net/if_ethersubr.
