RE: kern/161899: Repeating RTM_MISS packets causing high CPU load for ntpd

2012-02-09 Thread Li, Qing
Hmm... I don't see this problem until multiple FIBs are enabled. --Qing > -Original Message- > From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > n...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Steven Hartland > Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 11:13 AM > To: Gary Palmer > Cc: freebsd-net@fr

Re: Missed packet on recent em(4)

2012-02-09 Thread Arnaud Lacombe
Hi, On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Vogel, Jack wrote: > The NETMAP code is all self-contained, just delete what's inside the ifdef's > not exactly, the allocator stuff from r229939 is not that self contained, but beside that my problem is more to get the patches to apply to our internal 7-STABLE

Re: [PATCH] multiple instances of ipfw(4)

2012-02-09 Thread Julian Elischer
On 2/8/12 6:09 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 03:04:09PM +0100, Ermal Lu?i wrote: E> 2012/2/8 Gleb Smirnoff: E> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:02:04PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote: E> > L> if i understand what the patch does, i think it makes sense to be E> > L> able to hook

Re: kern/161899: Repeating RTM_MISS packets causing high CPU load for ntpd

2012-02-09 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: "Li, Qing" Hmm... I don't see this problem until multiple FIBs are enabled. I have a bog standard box here one default route and one active nic, which exhibits this issue so there shouldn't be multiple FIB's unless the fact that IPv6 is compiled in and act