On Jan 3, 2012, at 4:29 PM, Ed Maste wrote:
> Thanks for the link Nikolay.
>
> Borja, I assume it's the PR submission form that gave you trouble -
> sorry for that. Based on your report it sounds to me like the bug is
> in OpenBGPd itself. If it works on OpenBSD with the TCP_MD5SIG option
> th
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 5:29 AM, Ed Carrel wrote:
> Hi freebsd-net,
>
> I originally sent this to -questions@, but was redirected here by that
> list. My original question is below:
>
> I am running into a roadblock getting PF to filter traffic on a Netgraph
> interface representing an L2TP/IPSec
On 1/4/12 6:10 AM, Vijay Singh wrote:
> Hi. I would like to try out a 10G NIC from Broadcom. The BCM5716 seems
> promising. I am looking for features such as multi-queue, MSI-X, TSO
> etc. Any recommendations would be greatly appreciated.
>
Now, I'm going to offer you an indirect response.
Jack
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 09:27:28AM +0100, Borja Marcos wrote:
>
> On Jan 3, 2012, at 4:29 PM, Ed Maste wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the link Nikolay.
> >
> > Borja, I assume it's the PR submission form that gave you trouble -
> > sorry for that. Based on your report it sounds to me like the bug is
>
Hi,
I'm using a FreeBSD8.2-R-p5 in conjunction with MPD5.5 port for creating
pptp/l2tp tunnels.
I'm using MPPC (Compression & Encryption), my current onfiguration i use
only IPv4.
I keep getting in the logs the following:
Jan 3 19:15:21 mpd2 kernel: nd6_setmtu0: new link MTU on ng120 (1218) is
t
Sami Halabi wrote
in :
so> Hi,
so> I'm using a FreeBSD8.2-R-p5 in conjunction with MPD5.5 port for creating
so> pptp/l2tp tunnels.
so>
so> I'm using MPPC (Compression & Encryption), my current onfiguration i use
so> only IPv4.
so>
so> I keep getting in the logs the following:
so> Jan 3 19:15:2
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 12:59:18PM +0200, Sami Halabi wrote:
S> I'm using a FreeBSD8.2-R-p5 in conjunction with MPD5.5 port for creating
S> pptp/l2tp tunnels.
S>
S> I'm using MPPC (Compression & Encryption), my current onfiguration i use
S> only IPv4.
S>
S> I keep getting in the logs the followin
Hi,
i just tested the last log:
%tail /var/log/messages
Jan 3 23:21:50 mpd2 kernel: nd6_setmtu0: new link MTU on ng92 (1218) is
too small for IPv6
Jan 4 00:00:36 mpd2 kernel: nd6_setmtu0: new link MTU on ng105 (1218) is
too small for IPv6
Jan 4 00:34:48 mpd2 kernel: nd6_setmtu0: new link MTU on
On 4. Jan 2012, at 12:11 , Sami Halabi wrote:
> Hi,
> i just tested the last log:
> %tail /var/log/messages
> Jan 3 23:21:50 mpd2 kernel: nd6_setmtu0: new link MTU on ng92 (1218) is
> too small for IPv6
> Jan 4 00:00:36 mpd2 kernel: nd6_setmtu0: new link MTU on ng105 (1218) is
> too small for I
On 3. Jan 2012, at 22:19 , Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On 29. Dec 2011, at 20:27 , John Baldwin wrote:
>> I've gone ahead with this approach. I have three separate patches that
>> should
>> implement Phase 1. All of them can be found at
>> http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/
>>
>> - if_addr_dev.
On Wednesday, January 04, 2012 4:31:00 am Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> On 1/4/12 6:10 AM, Vijay Singh wrote:
> > Hi. I would like to try out a 10G NIC from Broadcom. The BCM5716 seems
> > promising. I am looking for features such as multi-queue, MSI-X, TSO
> > etc. Any recommendations would be greatly
> You are setting the keys with setkey for both directions of a single session,
> right?
> i.e.:
>
> add X.X.X.X Y.Y.Y.Y tcp 0x1000 -A tcp-md5 "SomePass";
> add Y.Y.Y.Y X.X.X.X tcp 0x1000 -A tcp-md5 "SomePass";
>
> As before it was only needed to set the "outgoing" direction key, which
> s
On 4. Jan 2012, at 12:45 , Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>
> On 3. Jan 2012, at 22:19 , Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>
>> On 29. Dec 2011, at 20:27 , John Baldwin wrote:
>>> I've gone ahead with this approach. I have three separate patches that
>>> should
>>> implement Phase 1. All of them can be found at
>
On Wednesday, January 04, 2012 7:45:26 am Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>
> On 3. Jan 2012, at 22:19 , Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>
> > On 29. Dec 2011, at 20:27 , John Baldwin wrote:
> >> I've gone ahead with this approach. I have three separate patches that
> >> should
> >> implement Phase 1. All of them
I'm including -net here so we can try and pull in further feedback
from network-cluey people.
On 4 January 2012 08:03, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> As discussed recently, ray@, adrian@ and myself are trying to get a framework
> and utility into the tree that allows the use and configuration of etherne
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 09:10:20PM -0800, Vijay Singh wrote:
> Hi. I would like to try out a 10G NIC from Broadcom. The BCM5716 seems
> promising. I am looking for features such as multi-queue, MSI-X, TSO
> etc. Any recommendations would be greatly appreciated.
>
> -vijay
>
> PS: I'd be using Fre
16 matches
Mail list logo
