On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 09:17:09AM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>
> On 22. Dec 2011, at 20:39 , Marcin Cieslak wrote:
>
> >>> Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> >>> I initially thought it's a transport layer issue, since previously (before
> >>> I changed configuration) 30%-50% SSH connection attempts su
On 11/24/2011 11:24 PM, Robert N. M. Watson wrote:
There was recently a commit to fix a race condition in 10-CURRENT which
>> I think is not slated to be merged for 9.0. You might check the commit
>> logs there and see if that fixes the problems you have -- if so, we
>> might want to reconside
Sami,
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 11:08:47PM +0200, Sami Halabi wrote:
S> Thanks for your patch, i applied it and its production already.
S> i had to stop mpd, and once started it i saw that all home routers
S> connected immediatly.
S> most of them don't use mppc, so I wonder why this problem happen
On 30 Dec 2011, at 19:48, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> On 11/24/2011 11:24 PM, Robert N. M. Watson wrote:
There was recently a commit to fix a race condition in 10-CURRENT which
>> I think is not slated to be merged for 9.0. You might check the commit
>> logs there and see if that fixe
> I have seen this behavior before when one of the addresses on an interface =
> is in a DMZ while the others are not. But this was with IPv4. I would assum=
> e IPv6 would have acted the same way but left it untested as it was not cri=
> tical. Take this as informational only and double check your
On 12/30/2011 3:31 PM, Robert N. M. Watson wrote:
Looking back at a recent post from you, it appears that you are on 8.x and not 9.x, as I
had assumed form your original e-mail. The patch I was referring to in 9-CURRENT has long
since been merged for 9.0 and will appear in that release. However
On 12/30/2011 4:46 PM, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
I see. Would you guys mind if I put that NULL pointer check into the
code for the time being and turn it into some kind of big nasty warning
in 8-stable branch only?
I could also open a ticket, put all debug information collected to date
in there. An
Who can commit?
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> n...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of ead...@freebsd.org
> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 7:35 AM
> To: ead...@freebsd.org; freebsd-b...@freebsd.org; freebsd-
> n...@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: ke
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 12:35:00AM +, Marcin Cieslak wrote:
> > I have seen this behavior before when one of the addresses on an interface =
> > is in a DMZ while the others are not. But this was with IPv4. I would assum=
> > e IPv6 would have acted the same way but left it untested as it was
On 30 December 2011 21:48, wrote:
>
> Who can commit?
>
Bug me after January 3rd. :)
Adrian
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freeb
10 matches
Mail list logo
