On 12/27/11 1:54 AM, Pawel Tyll wrote:
> Hi lists,
>
> Are there any profiling tools in the system or ports that would allow
> me to determine how much processing is being done per packet and how
> long does it take? I would like to predict possible PPS load for my
> system and perhaps locat
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 03:00:47PM +0100, Pawel Tyll wrote:
> > IPFW seems to add more or less constant overhead per rule. In our setup,
> > ~20 rules increase load by 100% (one core). We are able to reach 10GE
> > (1.1mpps) on some routers with most packets travelling 8-10 ipfw rules.
> > However
Hi,
do you use dummynet?
what is the server hardware configuration and tunings you did to acheive
10Gbps ?
Sami
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Alexander V. Chernikov <
melif...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On 27.12.2011 04:54, Pawel Tyll wrote:
>
>> Hi lists,
>>
>> Are there any profiling tools in t
On Tue, 27 Dec 2011, Rajneesh Kumar wrote:
During my development, I want to check if my modules compile successfully
or not. I am only changing the ARP portion and whenever I compile my
kernel, it takes around 20mins and compiles all different modules also.
I just want to compile and check wheth
> a 1500-byte frame is 12k bits so you need 830 Kpps
> to saturate the 10G link in one direction (and say another 450 Kpps
> as acks in the other direction).
Obviously, sorry. Didn't have enough sleep lately :)
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
h
Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 27.12.2011 20:11, per...@pluto.rain.com ?:
> > Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> >>
> >> See siftr(4). This module writes to a file.
> >
> > Is siftr(4) new since 8.1?
>
> HISTORY
> SIFTR first appeared in FreeBSD 7.4 and FreeBSD 8.2.
which explains why there's no man
> plans, yes - not sure how long it will take. I have compiled
> ipfw+dummynet as a standalone module (outside the kernel)
> but have not yet hooked the code to netmap to figure out how fast
> it can run.
If I understand correctly, this would require netmap to catch every
packet from interfaces
On 12/27/11 3:51 PM, Warren Block wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Dec 2011, Rajneesh Kumar wrote:
>
>> During my development, I want to check if my modules compile successfully
>> or not. I am only changing the ARP portion and whenever I compile my
>> kernel, it takes around 20mins and compiles all differen
perryh wrote:
> Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> >
> > See siftr(4). This module writes to a file.
>
> Is siftr(4) new since 8.1?
>
> $ man siftr
> No manual entry for siftr
> $ cd /usr/ports
> $ ls -d */*siftr*
> ls: */*siftr*: No such file or directory
>
You can look at:
http://people.freebsd.org/
Sami,
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 10:42:58AM +0200, Sami Halabi wrote:
S> i see in the logs many 4092, and a bit 4093 and 4094 as the log shows.
S>
S> I applied the both patches (the one you sent and the on on the pr) but i
S> didn't load the new module yet:
S> # kldunload ng_mppc
S> kldunload: can
On 27.12.2011 04:54, Pawel Tyll wrote:
Hi lists,
Are there any profiling tools in the system or ports that would allow
me to determine how much processing is being done per packet and how
long does it take? I would like to predict possible PPS load for my
system and perhaps locate and remo
okay,
i reverted back to my original ng_mppc.c.
btw: there an alternative module in here: http://www.mavhome.dp.ua/MPPC/
maybe this helps..
Sami
2011/12/27 Gleb Smirnoff
> Sami,
>
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 10:42:58AM +0200, Sami Halabi wrote:
> S> i see in the logs many 4092, and a bit 4093
Hi,
i see in the logs many 4092, and a bit 4093 and 4094 as the log shows.
I applied the both patches (the one you sent and the on on the pr) but i
didn't load the new module yet:
# kldunload ng_mppc
kldunload: can't unload file: Device busy
#
I'm afraid to force it so my MPD won't crash to uses
Hello,
I'm using PPP with an USB UMTS stick (Huawei E1750). The speed for
upload and download can be measured with, for example, pages like:
http://www.speedtest.net/
the results vary of course a bit, but usually they are between
1 and 4 Mbps;
how those values fit with the speed of the device /d
2011/12/27 Gleb Smirnoff :
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 11:30:01AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> J> You can find the patch for 8.x at
> J> http://www.freebsd.org/~jhb/patches/if_addr_rwlock.patch
>
> Just my two pennies: for head/ patching if ip_carp.c should
> be straightforward:
>
> 1) Using W in car
> IPFW seems to add more or less constant overhead per rule. In our setup,
> ~20 rules increase load by 100% (one core). We are able to reach 10GE
> (1.1mpps) on some routers with most packets travelling 8-10 ipfw rules.
> However, even with ipfw add 1 allow ip from any to any
> 1.1 mpps routing u
On 12/27/11 7:23 AM, Rajneesh Kumar wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> During my development, I want to check if my modules compile successfully
> or not. I am only changing the ARP portion and whenever I compile my
> kernel, it takes around 20mins and compiles all different modules also.
> I just want to co
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 03:18:04PM +0100, Pawel Tyll wrote:
> > plans, yes - not sure how long it will take. I have compiled
> > ipfw+dummynet as a standalone module (outside the kernel)
> > but have not yet hooked the code to netmap to figure out how fast
> > it can run.
> If I understand corre
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 11:29:02AM +0100, Ermal Lu?i wrote:
E> 2011/12/27 Gleb Smirnoff :
E> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 11:30:01AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
E> > J> You can find the patch for 8.x at
E> > J> http://www.freebsd.org/~jhb/patches/if_addr_rwlock.patch
E> >
E> > Just my two pennies: for
Synopsis: [re] interface does not count bytes on interface
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: yongari
State-Changed-When: Tue Dec 27 18:38:15 UTC 2011
State-Changed-Why:
I believe this has nothing to do with re(4).
See a possible patch for vlan(4) at the following URL.
http:/
On Tue, 27 Dec 2011, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 12/27/11 3:51 PM, Warren Block wrote:
On Tue, 27 Dec 2011, Rajneesh Kumar wrote:
During my development, I want to check if my modules compile successfully
or not. I am only changing the ARP portion and whenever I compile my
kernel, it takes around
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 09:44:23AM +0200, Sami Halabi wrote:
S> >1) Is the number always 4094?
S>
S> No, i see 4092, 4093 also:
S> Dec 24 09:17:04 mpd2 kernel: ng_mppc_decompress: too many (4092) packets
S> dropped
S> , disabling node 0xff003051e400!
S> Dec 24 09:17:04 mpd2 kernel:
S> Dec 24 1
YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 07:53:06PM +, Joe Holden wrote:
Hi guys,
Hope you're all enjoying the holiday.
Is anyone using bsnmpd with vlan interfaces? I see the following:
ifOutOctets.10 = Counter32: 0
ifOutOctets.11 = Counter32: 3061
ifOutOctets.12 = Counter32: 0
ifOu
On 12/27/11 8:19 PM, Warren Block wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Dec 2011, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>> On 12/27/11 3:51 PM, Warren Block wrote:
>>> On Tue, 27 Dec 2011, Rajneesh Kumar wrote:
>>>
During my development, I want to check if my modules compile
successfully
or not. I am only changing
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Warren Block wrote:
> make -j4 buildworld:
Try adding -DNO_CLEAN here,
> Normal 19:41
> ccache 6:02
>
> make -j4 buildkernel (custom kernel):
Try adding -DKERNFAST here for incremental builds.
> Normal 8:43
> ccache 2:47
--
Eitan Adler
_
Doing a lot of compiles recently and keep noting this noise in
sys/dev/ie:
/dumpster/scratch/sbruno-scratch/head/sys/dev/ie/if_ie.c: In function
'ieget':
/dumpster/scratch/sbruno-scratch/head/sys/dev/ie/if_ie.c:682: warning:
passing argument 1 of 'bcopy' discards qualifiers from pointer target
t
On Tue, 27 Dec 2011, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Those are best-case times. A typical ccache buildworld after csup to
-stable is about 9 minutes on this system.
That sounds good enough.
Are there any performance hits during production, as in, when not busy
rebuilding the world or whatever, just n
On 27 Dec 2011, at 21:22, Warren Block wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Dec 2011, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>
>>> Those are best-case times. A typical ccache buildworld after csup to
>>> -stable is about 9 minutes on this system.
>>
>> That sounds good enough.
>>
>> Are there any performance hits during pro
On 27 Dec 2011, at 20:30, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Warren Block wrote:
>> make -j4 buildworld:
> Try adding -DNO_CLEAN here,
>
I don't know, I'm ever afraid of running into whatever issues when not
performing a clean full rebuild...
>> Normal 19:41
>> ccache
So it's actually happening:
Nov 8 21:38:02 dal09 kernel: BZZT! Something is terribly wrong, up ==
NULL! inp = 0xff05e5798bd0
Nov 13 03:34:49 dal09 kernel: BZZT! Something is terribly wrong, up ==
NULL! inp = 0xff02e5b05930
Nov 30 04:18:11 dal09 kernel: BZZT! Something is terribly wrong
So it's actually happening:
Nov 8 21:38:02 dal09 kernel: BZZT! Something is terribly wrong, up ==
NULL! inp = 0xff05e5798bd0
Nov 13 03:34:49 dal09 kernel: BZZT! Something is terribly wrong, up ==
NULL! inp = 0xff02e5b05930
Nov 30 04:18:11 dal09 kernel: BZZT! Something is terribly wrong
Hi Gleb,
Thanks for your patch, i applied it and its production already.
i had to stop mpd, and once started it i saw that all home routers
connected immediatly.
most of them don't use mppc, so I wonder why this problem happend in the
first place.
whats surprising i had few hours ago the same probl
On 12/27/2011 6:36 AM, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
>> Is IPFW efficient enough to firewall 2x10GE (in+out) interfaces
>> without much latency increase, when running on modern hardware
>> with Intel NICs? Majority of processing tasks would probably be setfib
>> according to matches
Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On 12/27/2011 6:36 AM, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
>>> Is IPFW efficient enough to firewall 2x10GE (in+out) interfaces
>>> without much latency increase, when running on modern hardware
>>> with Intel NICs? Majority of processing tasks would probably be setfib
On Tue, 27 Dec 2011, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 27 Dec 2011, at 20:30, Eitan Adler wrote:
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Warren Block wrote:
make -j4 buildworld:
Try adding -DNO_CLEAN here,
I don't know, I'm ever afraid of running into whatever issues when not
performing a clean full
On 27 December 2011 23:45, Sean Bruno wrote:
> Doing a lot of compiles recently and keep noting this noise in
> sys/dev/ie:
>
>
>
> /dumpster/scratch/sbruno-scratch/head/sys/dev/ie/if_ie.c: In function
> 'ieget':
> /dumpster/scratch/sbruno-scratch/head/sys/dev/ie/if_ie.c:682: warning:
> passing ar
I can't help but remember when "someone" wrote an ipfw rule compiler -
ie, take ipfw ruleset, generate C code.
Maybe someone should write one and open source it this time.. :)
Adrian
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/ma
Hello, Luigi.
You wrote 27 декабря 2011 г., 18:26:00:
> plans, yes - not sure how long it will take. I have compiled
> ipfw+dummynet as a standalone module (outside the kernel)
> but have not yet hooked the code to netmap to figure out how fast
> it can run.
I still don't understand why it should
Hello, Adrian.
You wrote 28 декабря 2011 г., 10:04:13:
> Maybe someone should write one and open source it this time.. :)
In presence of LLVM in the base, it looks, that we should generate
native code from IPFW bytecodes, without intermediate C code :)
Looks doeable!
--
// Black Lion AKA Lev
2011/12/27 Lev Serebryakov :
> Hello, Luigi.
> You wrote 27 декабря 2011 г., 18:26:00:
>
>> plans, yes - not sure how long it will take. I have compiled
>> ipfw+dummynet as a standalone module (outside the kernel)
>> but have not yet hooked the code to netmap to figure out how fast
>> it can run.
>
On Wed, 28 Dec 2011, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Wed, 28 Dec 2011, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
These were used in probe routine and are left from the newbus rewrite.
I hacked ie a bit to build cleanly. [Not sure if I did this correctly.]
Use of the __DEVOLATILE() abomination is never correct. It exp
On 27 December 2011 22:32, Juli Mallett wrote:
> Reloading of mbufs into DMA descriptors? mbuf allocator overhead
> itself? Interrupts. Context switches under constant heavy load.
> Some indirection in the network stack.
Keeping caches primed? Not doing lots of very-deep-stack stuff for
each
On Wed, 28 Dec 2011, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
On 27 December 2011 23:45, Sean Bruno wrote:
Doing a lot of compiles recently and keep noting this noise in
sys/dev/ie:
/dumpster/scratch/sbruno-scratch/head/sys/dev/ie/if_ie.c: In function
'ieget':
/dumpster/scratch/sbruno-scratch/head/sys/dev/ie/
43 matches
Mail list logo
