Re: Possible MROUTING regression in 9.0 RC1

2011-11-10 Thread Emil Muratov
igmpproxy is an ugly hack. It was more or less working on 7.x, but very unstable. igmpproxy project is frozen, no updates since 2009. You can try udpxy as an alternative. And sometimes igmpproxy's shutdown lead to crash of my system. Without any panics, it just reboots. oO 2011/11/7 Pavel Ti

Problem with sbdrop panic

2011-11-10 Thread Chen, Kang (NSN - CN/Hangzhou)
Hi, freebsd expert I'm using freebsd 6.2 version and I encounter a sbdrop panic problem. I establish several sctp association between client and server, after I restart the client, then the server also restart caused by sbdrop panic. Hopefully can get your help with this problem. Best Regards, C

Re: Possible MROUTING regression in 9.0 RC1

2011-11-10 Thread Pavel Timofeev
Thank you! I'll try! I'm going crazy. Now I can crash even FreeBSD 8.2 RELEASE with igmpproxy in some coincidence. I can get kernel dump on 8.2, and can try to get dump on 9.0-RC1. Is it interesting? 2011/11/10 Emil Muratov : > > igmpproxy is an ugly hack. It was more or less working on 7.x, but

Re: Problem with sbdrop panic

2011-11-10 Thread Michael Tüxen
On Nov 10, 2011, at 8:45 AM, Chen, Kang (NSN - CN/Hangzhou) wrote: > Hi, freebsd expert > > I'm using freebsd 6.2 version and I encounter a sbdrop panic problem. Are you really using 6.2? This version is very old? Can you upgrade to one of the 9.0 release candidates and see if the problem persist

Re: Intel 82574L interface wedging on em 7.1.9/7.2.3 when MSIX enabled

2011-11-10 Thread Hooman Fazaeli
On 11/10/2011 3:39 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: There's no locking around the OACTIVE flag set/clear, right? Is it possible that multiple TX threads are fiddling with OACTIVE and then it's not being properly cleared and tx kicked? Adrian If we check for OACTIVE periodically (for instance, in local_

Re: Intel 82574L interface wedging on em 7.1.9/7.2.3 when MSIX enabled

2011-11-10 Thread Hooman Fazaeli
On 11/10/2011 3:39 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: There's no locking around the OACTIVE flag set/clear, right? Is it possible that multiple TX threads are fiddling with OACTIVE and then it's not being properly cleared and tx kicked? Adrian sorry! I forgot to cleanup the the last message ... here is t

Re: Possible MROUTING regression in 9.0 RC1

2011-11-10 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:15:11PM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote: P> Thank you! I'll try! P> I'm going crazy. P> Now I can crash even FreeBSD 8.2 RELEASE with igmpproxy in some coincidence. P> P> I can get kernel dump on 8.2, and can try to get dump on 9.0-RC1. Is P> it interesting? Backtrace and d

Netgraph multithreading

2011-11-10 Thread Алексей Якименко
Hello! Can you help me please? Is Netgraph supports multithreading in FreeBSD 8.1 ? I found that in the function "ngb_mod_event" (ng_base.c, line 3114) multiple threads runs function "ngthread" (ng_base.c, line 3315). What does this function? Or another question. Where is the parallelization of h

Re: FreeBSD 9 and ARP multicast source address error messages

2011-11-10 Thread Alexander Wittig
Gleb, Am 10.11.2011 um 01:51 schrieb Gleb Smirnoff: > On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 05:14:45PM -0500, Alexander Wittig wrote: > A> I upgraded one of my machines from FreeBSD 8 to 9.0-RC1 (FreeBSD > bt.pa.msu.edu 9.0-RC1 FreeBSD 9.0-RC1 #3: Fri Oct 28 16:45:28 EDT 2011 > r...@bt.pa.msu.edu:/usr/ob

Re: Intel 82574L interface wedging on em 7.1.9/7.2.3 when MSIX enabled

2011-11-10 Thread Adrian Chadd
Wait, but low resources which are stopping _what_ ? The whole point behind OACTIVE is to say "oi, give me time to flush my TX queue." I'll tell you when I'm ready. So when you clear OACTIVE after a TX completion handler, you would then call _start (or _start_locked) to reschedule some more frames

Re: FreeBSD 9 and ARP multicast source address error messages

2011-11-10 Thread David DeSimone
Alexander Wittig wrote: > > Nov 10 12:25:45 bt kernel: in_arp: 03:bf:23:09:44:e4 is multicast > Nov 10 12:25:45 bt kernel: in_arp: 03:bf:23:09:44:87 is multicast > [...] > > I'm not an expert on networking, but is this condition of ignoring > such an ARP packet really a noteworthy event? I.e. is

Re: Intel 82574L interface wedging on em 7.1.9/7.2.3 when MSIX enabled

2011-11-10 Thread Jack Vogel
I'm testing something right now, what I've done is take all the OACTIVE manipulation and centralized it to the start routines (multiqueue or single), and I now keep a queue specific drained variable that gets set when you run to minimum descriptors, and then cleared in txeof. In start, particularly

Re: Intel 82574L interface wedging on em 7.1.9/7.2.3 when MSIX enabled

2011-11-10 Thread Adrian Chadd
In the case of multi-threaded OACTIVE, why not just do this: upon queue completion: * lock; * do queue completion; * if any frames were completed, clear queue busy; * if (queue busy == clear && OACTIVE) clear OACTIVE; * run queue completion; * unlock. upon queue transmit: * lock; * queue frame;

ipf(8) for TCP connection rate limiting

2011-11-10 Thread Vijay Singh
Hi. My machine has some ipf(8) rules and I see that when there is a TCP connection storm to the http port the filer sends out TCP resets. I wanted to know if its possible to configure the pps limit for TCP connections before the RSTs kick in using ipf. regards, vijay __

Re: Possible MROUTING regression in 9.0 RC1

2011-11-10 Thread Pavel Timofeev
Hmm. I just CSUPed and rebuilt my kernel&world. (r227207?) It seems the problems are gone! 10 ноября 2011 г. 13:52 пользователь Gleb Smirnoff написал: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:15:11PM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote: > P> Thank you! I'll try! > P> I'm going crazy. > P> Now I can crash even FreeBS