Re: Intel 82574L interface wedging on em 7.1.9/7.2.3 when MSIX enabled

2011-10-31 Thread Hooman Fazaeli
On 10/31/2011 7:33 AM, Jason Wolfe wrote: Thanks for looking into this. I'd be happy to test any patch thrown my way, but keep in mind my issue is only tickled when MSI-X is enabled. My interfaces aren't bouncing, though it might be possible some unique path in the MSI-X code is causing a th

Re: Intel 82574L interface wedging on em 7.1.9/7.2.3 when MSIX enabled

2011-10-31 Thread Emil Muratov
You may try these settings and see if they help: - hw.em.fc_setting=0 (in /boot/loader.conf) - hw.em.rxd="4096" (in /boot/loader.conf) - hw.em.txd="4096" (in /boot/loader.conf) - Fix speed and duplex at both link sides. After doing that, confirm on the freebsd box (with ifconfig) and the ot

Re: Intel 82574L interface wedging on em 7.1.9/7.2.3 when MSIX enabled

2011-10-31 Thread Hooman Fazaeli
On 10/31/2011 11:43 AM, Emil Muratov wrote: You may try these settings and see if they help: - hw.em.fc_setting=0 (in /boot/loader.conf) - hw.em.rxd="4096" (in /boot/loader.conf) - hw.em.txd="4096" (in /boot/loader.conf) - Fix speed and duplex at both link sides. After doing that, confirm on

Re: Intel 82574L interface wedging on em 7.1.9/7.2.3 when MSIX enabled

2011-10-31 Thread Emil Muratov
On 31.10.2011 12:13, Hooman Fazaeli wrote: Thanks for looking into this. I'd be happy to test any patch thrown my way, but keep in mind my issue is only tickled when MSI-X is enabled. My interfaces aren't bouncing, though it might be possible some unique path in the MSI-X code is causing

Re: Intel 82574L interface wedging on em 7.1.9/7.2.3 when MSIX enabled

2011-10-31 Thread Hooman Fazaeli
On 10/31/2011 12:51 PM, Emil Muratov wrote: On 31.10.2011 12:13, Hooman Fazaeli wrote: Thanks for looking into this. I'd be happy to test any patch thrown my way, but keep in mind my issue is only tickled when MSI-X is enabled. My interfaces aren't bouncing, though it might be possible so

Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org

2011-10-31 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker

Re[2]: PCI-E VT6130 NIC (if_vge) hang system with gigabit link

2011-10-31 Thread Andrey Smagin
31 октября 2011, 04:56 от YongHyeon PYUN : > On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 09:57:30AM +0400, Andrey Smagin wrote: > > > > Ok. With autonegotiation ifconfig show speed 100MBit. > > And vge(4) work without problems with the resolved speed/duplex > of auto-negotiation? > > > with manual 1000baseT full-

Re[2]: PCI-E VT6130 NIC (if_vge) hang system with gigabit link

2011-10-31 Thread Andrey Smagin
31 октября 2011, 04:57 от YongHyeon PYUN : > On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 09:57:30AM +0400, Andrey Smagin wrote: > > > > Ok. With autonegotiation ifconfig show speed 100MBit. > > And vge(4) work without problems with the resolved speed/duplex > of auto-negotiation? With auto-negotiation vge connect

Re: kern/162201: [ip] [patch] multicast forwarding cache hash always allocated with size 0, resulting in buffer overrun

2011-10-31 Thread linimon
Old Synopsis: [patch] multicast forwarding cache hash always allocated with size 0, resulting in buffer overrun New Synopsis: [ip] [patch] multicast forwarding cache hash always allocated with size 0, resulting in buffer overrun Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net Responsible-

Re: misc/162201: [patch] multicast forwarding cache hash always allocated with size 0, resulting in buffer overrun

2011-10-31 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
The following reply was made to PR kern/162201; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Stevan Markovic Cc: freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org, z...@freebsd.org, b...@freebsd.org, b...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/162201: [patch] multicast forwarding cache hash always allocat

RE: misc/162201: [patch] multicast forwarding cache hash always allocated with size 0, resulting in buffer overrun

2011-10-31 Thread Stevan_Markovic
The following reply was made to PR kern/162201; it has been noted by GNATS. From: To: Cc: , , , Subject: RE: misc/162201: [patch] multicast forwarding cache hash always allocated with size 0, resulting in buffer overrun Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:26:43 -0500 Hi, Gleb, no, I have no

Re: kern/162110: Releng_9 panics on boot in IGB driver - regression from 8.2

2011-10-31 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
The following reply was made to PR kern/162110; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Frank Terhaar-Yonkers Cc: freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org, j...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/162110: Releng_9 panics on boot in IGB driver - regression from 8.2 Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 22:37:28

Re: misc/162201: [patch] multicast forwarding cache hash always allocated with size 0, resulting in buffer overrun

2011-10-31 Thread Marko Zec
The following reply was made to PR kern/162201; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Marko Zec To: stevan_marko...@mcafee.com Cc: gleb...@freebsd.org, freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org, b...@freebsd.org, b...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/162201: [patch] multicast forwarding cache hash always all

Undocumented netgraph `cmd' flags ?

2011-10-31 Thread Arnaud Lacombe
Hi Julian, For my information, is it documented anywhere that bit 28[0] and 29[1] of Netgraph message's `cmd' shall not be used (the bits, not the macros) ? Thanks, - Arnaud [0]: NGM_READONLY [1]: NGM_HASREPLY ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list

[High Interrupt Count] Networking Difficulties

2011-10-31 Thread Paul A. Procacci
Gents, I'm having quite an aweful problem that I need a bit of help with. I have an HPDL360 G3 ( http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/11504_na/11504_na.HTML ) which acts as a NAT (via PF) for several (600+) class C's amongst 24+ machines sitting behind it. It's running FPSense (FreeBS

Re: bin/155365: [patch] routed(8): if.c in routed fails to compile if time_t and long are different sizes

2011-10-31 Thread kevlo
Synopsis: [patch] routed(8): if.c in routed fails to compile if time_t and long are different sizes State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: kevlo State-Changed-When: Tue Nov 1 03:25:20 UTC 2011 State-Changed-Why: Fixed in r204405 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=155365 _

Re: [High Interrupt Count] Networking Difficulties

2011-10-31 Thread Paul A. Procacci
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 08:57:46PM -0500, Paul A. Procacci wrote: > Gents, > > I'm having quite an aweful problem that I need a bit of help with. > > I have an HPDL360 G3 ( > http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/11504_na/11504_na.HTML ) which > acts as a NAT (via PF) for several (600+) c

Re: Undocumented netgraph `cmd' flags ?

2011-10-31 Thread Julian Elischer
On 10/31/11 4:16 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: Hi Julian, For my information, is it documented anywhere that bit 28[0] and 29[1] of Netgraph message's `cmd' shall not be used (the bits, not the macros) ? Thanks, - Arnaud [0]: NGM_READONLY [1]: NGM_HASREPLY Not really sure what you are asking.