Re: kern/144572: [carp] CARP preemption mode traffic partially goes to backup node

2011-10-18 Thread glebius
Synopsis: [carp] CARP preemption mode traffic partially goes to backup node State-Changed-From-To: closed->open State-Changed-By: glebius State-Changed-When: Tue Oct 18 08:15:18 UTC 2011 State-Changed-Why: Submitter claims (via irc) that email problem is fixed. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-p

Re: nge(4), tl(4), wb(4) and rl(4) 8129 testers wanted [Re: Question about GPIO bitbang MII]

2011-10-18 Thread andrew bliznak
On Sun, 2011-10-16 at 03:08 +0200, Marius Strobl wrote: > On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 02:46:23AM +0200, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > > > > > > On 15 Oct 2011, at 22:56, Marius Strobl wrote: > > > > > > > > Could owners of nge(4), tl(4), wb(4) and rl(4) driven hardware (as for > > > rl(4) only 8129 nee

ether_demux does not handle frames with embedded vlan tags

2011-10-18 Thread Ryan Stone
ether_demux currently assumes that all vlan-tagged packets that it sees have had the vlan stripped out and the M_VLAN tag is set, so it never checks the ether type for a vlan. However ng_ether_rcv_upper currently does not guarantee that this is the case(and there may be other code paths where this

Re: bce(4) with IPMI

2011-10-18 Thread John Baldwin
On Tuesday, October 11, 2011 3:52:25 pm Sean Bruno wrote: > In addition, the IPMI driver attaches to "something" and I can poke at > it via ipmitool. So, from the driver perspective, the attempt to detect > MFW enabled doesn't work as the chipset still thinks that its "on". The ipmi driver attach

Re: nge(4), tl(4), wb(4) and rl(4) 8129 testers wanted [Re: Question about GPIO bitbang MII]

2011-10-18 Thread Marius Strobl
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:57:01PM +0300, andrew bliznak wrote: > On Sun, 2011-10-16 at 03:08 +0200, Marius Strobl wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 02:46:23AM +0200, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 15 Oct 2011, at 22:56, Marius Strobl wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Could owners of

RE: ether_demux does not handle frames with embedded vlan tags

2011-10-18 Thread rozhuk . im
> ether_demux currently assumes that all vlan-tagged packets that it > sees have had the vlan stripped out and the M_VLAN tag is set, so it > never checks the ether type for a vlan. However ng_ether_rcv_upper > currently does not guarantee that this is the case(and there may be > other code paths

Re: ether_demux does not handle frames with embedded vlan tags

2011-10-18 Thread Ryan Stone
2011/10/18 : > In what cases vlan-tagged packet can be received by ng_ether_rcv_upper ? If another node attaches to an ng_ether node's upper hook and sends a vlan tagged packet to the hook. ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.o

RE: ether_demux does not handle frames with embedded vlan tags

2011-10-18 Thread rozhuk . im
> > In what cases vlan-tagged packet can be received by > ng_ether_rcv_upper ? > > If another node attaches to an ng_ether node's upper hook and sends a > vlan tagged packet to the hook. This may be a wrong configuration or QinQ: packet may have M_VLAN tag is set and still vlan-tagged (ether_type