On 14.10.2011 21:12, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 09:06:57PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
A> > Won't ifconfig it down work?
A>
A> Not if I want to continue to use the primary or other non-carp address.
Well, the best idea for that case would be switch them to backup mode.
In
Synopsis: [carp] 6.2 kernel crash [regression]
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->glebius
Responsible-Changed-By: glebius
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Oct 15 08:17:15 UTC 2011
Responsible-Changed-Why:
I'm now working on major rewrite of CARP for FreeBSD 10, and
I'd like to take all relate
Synopsis: [carp] [panic] carp causes kernel panics in any constellation
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->glebius
Responsible-Changed-By: glebius
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Oct 15 08:19:31 UTC 2011
Responsible-Changed-Why:
I'm now working on major rewrite of CARP for FreeBSD 10, and
I'
Synopsis: [carp] [lagg] CARP combined with LAGG causes system panic - 7.0/amd64
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->glebius
Responsible-Changed-By: glebius
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Oct 15 08:30:56 UTC 2011
Responsible-Changed-Why:
I'm now working on major rewrite of CARP for FreeBSD 10
Synopsis: [carp] CARP interface renaming makes system no longer respond on the
virtual IP address
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->glebius
Responsible-Changed-By: glebius
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Oct 15 08:32:41 UTC 2011
Responsible-Changed-Why:
I'm now working on major rewrite of
Synopsis: [carp] CARP interface destruction with ifconfig destroy causes kernel
panic
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->glebius
Responsible-Changed-By: glebius
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Oct 15 08:34:57 UTC 2011
Responsible-Changed-Why:
I'm now working on major rewrite of CARP for Fre
Synopsis: [carp] [panic] Kernel panic with EtherIP (may be related to SVN
commit 178025)
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: glebius
State-Changed-When: Sat Oct 15 08:41:16 UTC 2011
State-Changed-Why:
Feedback requeted.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=129508
_
The following reply was made to PR kern/129508; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Gleb Smirnoff
To: Boris Kochergin
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: kern/129508: [carp] [panic] Kernel panic with EtherIP (may be
related to SVN commit 178025)
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 12:41:07 +0400
Boris,
Synopsis: [carp] carp(4) advskew setting ignored when carp IP used on a gif(4)
interface
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->glebius
Responsible-Changed-By: glebius
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Oct 15 09:00:31 UTC 2011
Responsible-Changed-Why:
I'm now working on major rewrite of CARP for
Synopsis: [carp] alias gives incorrect hash in dmesg
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->glebius
Responsible-Changed-By: glebius
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Oct 15 09:02:28 UTC 2011
Responsible-Changed-Why:
I'm now working on major rewrite of CARP for FreeBSD 10, and
I'd like to take all
Synopsis: [carp] [hang] use of carp(4) causes system to freeze
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->glebius
Responsible-Changed-By: glebius
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Oct 15 09:04:10 UTC 2011
Responsible-Changed-Why:
I'm now working on major rewrite of CARP for FreeBSD 10, and
I'd like to
Synopsis: [carp] CARP arp replays with wrong src mac
State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: glebius
State-Changed-When: Sat Oct 15 09:08:48 UTC 2011
State-Changed-Why:
Let's look at this closer.
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->glebius
Responsible-Changed-By: glebius
R
> My system on the other hand just reports "No Carrier" in ifconfig,
> even after resetting the router, and other devices in the home can see
> it, and connect to it fine.
>
Can you
#wlandebug -i wlan0 crypto+assoc+auth+scan
and re-run wpa_supplicant when the link is droped? I wonder what is faili
The following reply was made to PR kern/144572; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Gleb Smirnoff
To: "Eugene M. Zheganin"
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: kern/144572: [carp] CARP preemption mode traffic partially goes to
backup node
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 18:17:49 +0400
Eugene,
is
Synopsis: [carp] CARP preemption mode traffic partially goes to backup node
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: glebius
State-Changed-When: Sat Oct 15 14:21:53 UTC 2011
State-Changed-Why:
Submitter mail relay is not accepting a valid email.
- The following addresses had
Synopsis: [carp] [if_bridge] carp stuck in init when using bridge interface
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->glebius
Responsible-Changed-By: glebius
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Oct 15 14:25:17 UTC 2011
Responsible-Changed-Why:
I'm now working on major rewrite of CARP for FreeBSD 10, an
Synopsis: [carp] ipv6 does not work on carp interfaces [regression]
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->glebius
Responsible-Changed-By: glebius
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Oct 15 14:26:48 UTC 2011
Responsible-Changed-Why:
I'm now working on major rewrite of CARP for FreeBSD 10, and
I'd li
The following reply was made to PR kern/155030; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Gleb Smirnoff
To: Martin Matuska
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: kern/155030: [igb] igb(4) DEVICE_POLLING does not work with carp(4)
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 18:31:25 +0400
Martin,
it isn't clear from
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 01:32:26PM -0700, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:49:03PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 04:57:07PM -0700, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 10:42:22PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 0
Could owners of nge(4), tl(4), wb(4) and rl(4) driven hardware (as for
rl(4) only 8129 need testing, 8139 don't) please give the following
patch a try in order to ensure it doesn't break anything?
for 9/head:
http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/mii_bitbang.diff
for 8:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mari
The following reply was made to PR kern/149643; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Steven Chamberlain
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, n...@jelal.kn-bremen.de
Cc: henry.hu...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: kern/149643: [rum] device not sending proper beacon frames in
ap mode
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 22:56:55
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 02:46:23AM +0200, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>
>
> On 15 Oct 2011, at 22:56, Marius Strobl wrote:
>
> >
> > Could owners of nge(4), tl(4), wb(4) and rl(4) driven hardware (as for
> > rl(4) only 8129 need testing, 8139 don't) please give the following
> > patch a try in orde
Hi!
Thanks for your diagnosis. I don't have any rum hardware at the moment
(and no time to go diving through the code) but that's an excellent
set of debugging/diagnosis results you have there.
Just look at what the mgmtrate is set to? It should be set to 1mbit
for both 11b and 11g. It shouldn't
On 15 Oct 2011, at 22:56, Marius Strobl wrote:
>
> Could owners of nge(4), tl(4), wb(4) and rl(4) driven hardware (as for
> rl(4) only 8129 need testing, 8139 don't) please give the following
> patch a try in order to ensure it doesn't break anything?
> for 9/head:
> http://people.freebsd.org/
Hi Adrian,
On 16/10/11 02:15, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Just look at what the mgmtrate is set to? It should be set to 1mbit
> for both 11b and 11g.
I've just managed to test this, but it seems everything was as it should
be. An mgmtrate of 2 is chosen (1Mbit), and I've checked from another
device th
25 matches
Mail list logo
