The following reply was made to PR kern/159601; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: dfil...@freebsd.org (dfilter service)
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/159601: commit references a PR
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 08:26:35 + (UTC)
Author: qingli
Date: Thu Oct 13 08:26:23 2011
Hi,
I'm using a quagga 0.99.17 box with dual cpu with 6C each,with 6GB Memory
running on FreeBSD 8.1-R-p6.
i wonder what do you think about this box on term of DDoS handling, pps
handling and so on.
if you have recommendations on how to improve max pps I appreciate it.
the Nics configuration is as
The following reply was made to PR kern/159602; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: dfil...@freebsd.org (dfilter service)
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/159602: commit references a PR
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 09:21:58 + (UTC)
Author: qingli
Date: Thu Oct 13 09:21:49 2011
The following reply was made to PR kern/159601; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Svatopluk Kraus
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/159601: [netinet] [patch] in_scrubprefix() - loopback route
refcount malfunction
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:19:07 +0200
Thanks for commit. I thi
The following reply was made to PR kern/159603; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Svatopluk Kraus
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/159603: [netinet] [patch] in_ifscrubprefix() - network route
can be installed for interfaces marked down
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:21:16 +0200
The following reply was made to PR kern/159602; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Svatopluk Kraus
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/159602: [netinet] [patch] arp_ifscrub() is called even if
IFF_NOARP flag is set
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:20:18 +0200
Thanks for commit. I thin
Synopsis: [carp] [patch] when preemption is enabled carp interface assumes
MASTERship immediately even with higher advbase/advskew
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->glebius
Responsible-Changed-By: glebius
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Oct 13 14:03:27 UTC 2011
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Tak
Synopsis: [carp] [patch] when preemption is enabled carp interface assumes
MASTERship immediately even with higher advbase/advskew
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: glebius
State-Changed-When: Thu Oct 13 14:03:56 UTC 2011
State-Changed-Why:
Dup of kern/161123
http://www.free
Some more information.. I had mentioned this issue to someone on the
##FreeBSD irc channel, and he said that his father uses the urtw
driver, on an i386 system, also running 8.2, but has no issues with
kernel panics, and the only drops that he knows is due to his router,
and resetting the router so
Hello networkers,
I've updated patch & README here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~glebius/newcarp/
Going to commit it to head/ soon. Then I'd like to make
a run through carp-related PRs, update documentation, settle
things a bit... and then make more hacking to restore the
arpbalance featur
The following reply was made to PR kern/157418; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Wojciech A. Koszek"
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, to...@tutus.se
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/157418: [em] em driver lockup during boot on Supermicro
X9SCM-F
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:59:31 +0200
Hello,
Looks like
http://www.zdnet.com/news/dennis-ritchie-father-of-unix-and-c-dies/6314570
--
Justin
IT-TECH
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd
On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 15:49 -0700, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:52:25PM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> >
> > > > > The Broadcom MFW is configured to load/not load through an NVRAM
> > > > > option that is likely not affected by the iDRAC BIOS settings.
> > > > > To disable MFW y
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 12:59:35AM -0700, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 10:07:02AM -0400, Karim wrote:
> > > ... why are we ORing the same call twice isn't the same thing
> > > as calling it once:
> > >
> > > bmsr = PHY_READ(sc, E1000_SR) | PHY_R
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 4:47 PM, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 12:59:35AM -0700, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
>> YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
>> > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 10:07:02AM -0400, Karim wrote:
>> > > ... why are we ORing the same call twice isn't the same thing
>> > > as
> Ran this on my Dell R410. I can clearly see that the tool is
> "disabling" the MFW bit, and that the dell bios interface to the IPMI
> controller/DRAC is impaired, however ...
>
> The system still thinks that the MFW bit is "ON" and proceeds normally
> in this case. The code still fails to det
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 04:57:07PM -0700, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 10:42:22PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 03:55:31PM -0700, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:23:18PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 1
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 05:02:58PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 4:47 PM, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 12:59:35AM -0700, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> >> YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 10:07:02AM -0400, Karim wrote:
> >
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 5:54 PM, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 05:02:58PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 4:47 PM, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
>> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 12:59:35AM -0700, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
>> >> YongHyeon PYUN wrote
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 13:58 -0700, David Christensen wrote:
> > Ran this on my Dell R410. I can clearly see that the tool is
> > "disabling" the MFW bit, and that the dell bios interface to the IPMI
> > controller/DRAC is impaired, however ...
> >
> > The system still thinks that the MFW bit is "
20 matches
Mail list logo
