> Could you show us more specifics about your configuration and packet
> dump in question?
Yes! It's the FreeBSD 8.2 release. The only thing which is activated in the
rc.conf is ipv6.
I've included the ifconfig output and a wireshark capture.
The capture is taken during the startup of the Free
My Os is FreeBSD 9.0 Beta2.
In kernel configure file, I enable the option of SCTP_DEBUG and rebuild the
kernel. Then I use sctp to send or recv data from another computer ,after
that I check the result from var/log/message or var/log/dmesg , both of the
two files show any message about sctp debug.
On 30 September 2011 13:48, jyl wrote:
> My Os is FreeBSD 9.0 Beta2.
> In kernel configure file, I enable the option of SCTP_DEBUG and rebuild the
> kernel. Then I use sctp to send or recv data from another computer ,after
> that I check the result from var/log/message or var/log/dmesg , both of
On Sep 30, 2011, at 11:48 AM, jyl wrote:
> My Os is FreeBSD 9.0 Beta2.
> In kernel configure file, I enable the option of SCTP_DEBUG and rebuild the
> kernel. Then I use sctp to send or recv data from another computer ,after
> that I check the result from var/log/message or var/log/dmesg , both o
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 16:12:55 +0200 K. Macy wrote:
KM> Sorry, didn't look at the images (limited bw), I've seen something KM>
like this before in timewait. This "can't happen" with UDP so will be KM>
interested in learning more about the bug.
The pa
W dniu 2011-09-29 23:07, Marek Salwerowicz pisze:
So eg. the rules specifying traffic between DMZ Host and LAN could be
the first, and then rules for "generic" DMZ host traffic (allowing DMZ
access to the Internet)?
So far I made like this (first DMZ-LAN, then DMZ), but I have some
problem:
i
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Marek Salwerowicz wrote:
> W dniu 2011-09-29 23:07, Marek Salwerowicz pisze:
>
> So eg. the rules specifying traffic between DMZ Host and LAN could be the
>> first, and then rules for "generic" DMZ host traffic (allowing DMZ access to
>> the Internet)?
>> So far
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Wed, 28 Sep 2011, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 16:12:55 +0200 K. Macy wrote:
>>
>> KM> Sorry, didn't look at the images (limited bw), I've seen something KM>
>> like this before in timewait. This "can't happen" with UDP s
