Hi!
The FreeBSD 8.2 sends sevaral MLDv2 listener reports during startup.
The system sends one listener report with its solicited multicast address which
comes from the automatically generated link local address.
But I can see another MLD2 listener report with 2 records. One is the mentioned
soli
"Rainer Bredehorn" wrote
in <20110929123201.282...@gmx.net>:
Br> Hi!
Br>
Br> The FreeBSD 8.2 sends sevaral MLDv2 listener reports during startup.
Br> The system sends one listener report with its solicited multicast
Br> address which comes from the automatically generated link local
Br> address
tcp_output() does:
if (... && len > tp->t_maxseg && ...)
tso = 1;
Then:
if (len + optlen + ipoptlen > tp->t_maxopd) {
...
if (tso) {
...
if (sendalot && off + len < so->so_snd.sb_cc) {
We've been getting reports of odd behavior on our Dell R410 machines
when trying to use IPMI. The servers have two NIC's that we have
assigned as the IPMI interface(bce0) and production interface(bce1)
respectively.
Since we don't actually configure bce0 in FreeBSD, we've found that the
IPMI inte
W dniu 2011-09-26 21:20, Freddie Cash pisze:
Your rules are too generic, they will not work for a double-NAT setup.
Each and every single rule must specify the network interface. And it must
specify whether it's incoming (in recv) or outgoing (out xmit) traffic.
Don't use "via" anywhere.
Whi
Sean Bruno wrote:
We've been getting reports of odd behavior on our Dell R410 machines
when trying to use IPMI. The servers have two NIC's that we have
assigned as the IPMI interface(bce0) and production interface(bce1)
respectively.
Since we don't actually configure bce0 in FreeBSD, we've foun
On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 11:27 -0700, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Sean Bruno wrote:
> > We've been getting reports of odd behavior on our Dell R410 machines
> > when trying to use IPMI. The servers have two NIC's that we have
> > assigned as the IPMI interface(bce0) and production interface(bce1)
> > r
On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 10:01 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> We've been getting reports of odd behavior on our Dell R410 machines
> when trying to use IPMI. The servers have two NIC's that we have
> assigned as the IPMI interface(bce0) and production interface(bce1)
> respectively.
>
> Since we don't a
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Marek Salwerowicz wrote:
> W dniu 2011-09-26 21:20, Freddie Cash pisze:
>
> Your rules are too generic, they will not work for a double-NAT setup.
>> Each and every single rule must specify the network interface. And it
>> must
>> specify whether it's incoming (
W dniu 2011-09-29 21:57, Freddie Cash pisze:
In generic terms, the packet flow is like this:
src: lan private subnet dest: server public ip
src: lan private subnet dest: server private ip
src: lan private subnet dest: server private ip
src: lan public ip d
I have a pair of brand new R410's I've been using for CARP+PFSYNC
pair. I believe the LOM was disabled by default and have not tried to
use it, IIRC. Been using bce0 as the outside interface with no issues
and bce1 as the sync
I'm running FreeBSD 8.2 though. I can get more details about the
ha
On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 16:48 -0700, Matthew Franz wrote:
> I have a pair of brand new R410's I've been using for CARP+PFSYNC
> pair. I believe the LOM was disabled by default and have not tried to
> use it, IIRC. Been using bce0 as the outside interface with no issues
> and bce1 as the sync
>
On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 12:10 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 10:01 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> > We've been getting reports of odd behavior on our Dell R410 machines
> > when trying to use IPMI. The servers have two NIC's that we have
> > assigned as the IPMI interface(bce0) and pro
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> .. so now there's a patch:
>
> * is there a PR for this?
> * if there is, can we get this patch and the discussion about this bug
> placed in the PR? :)
>
> That way it doesn't get lost. No, I lie. It doesn't get "too lost". :-)
What are you
On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 17:53 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 12:10 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 10:01 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> > > We've been getting reports of odd behavior on our Dell R410 machines
> > > when trying to use IPMI. The servers have two NIC's
On 30 September 2011 09:04, dave jones wrote:
> What are you waiting for? The issue is reproducible. If you're running
> FreeBSD 9 with Mikolaj's test_udp program, you'll get the kernel panic.
> I think sysadmins won't be happy about this...
Well, the people familiar with the network stack need
16 matches
Mail list logo
