Hi,
> On Mon, 8 Aug 2011 07:55:11 -0400
> "J.R. Oldroyd" said:
> Is there any chance that you could create a patch for 8.2 based on the
> commits in HEAD?
> That would be great!
>
fbsd> Better would be to ask hrs@ to MFC his commits to 8-stable.
hrs@ posted MFC candidate patch for rev
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 09:38:04AM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote:
F> However, I'm not sure I understand the reasoning for removing the carpX
F> pseudo-interface. It's really nice having the symmetry between carpX,
F> vlanX, brX, and other pseudo-interfaces, and keeping the configuration
F> details sep
agnose.
Here's my tweaked version of Andre's patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~lstewart/patches/misctcp/tcp_reass.c-logdebug%2bmissingsegment-20110811-lstewart.diff
It has only been compile tested at this point.
BTW, when a patch is eventually committed, the logging changes should be
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:30:29AM +1000, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> On 08/05/11 16:57, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 12:02:18AM +1000, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> [snip]
> >>
> >> The real fix which is somewhere down on my todo list is to make all
> >> these memory constraint
On 08/11/11 22:31, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:30:29AM +1000, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 08/05/11 16:57, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 12:02:18AM +1000, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
[snip]
The real fix which is somewhere down on my todo list is to mak
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:33:37PM +1000, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> >>> Autotunig w/o limits is bad idea. This is way to DoS.
> >>
> >> Depends how it is implemented. With appropriate backpressure mechanisms
> >> put in place, it could be perfectly safe. I envisage reassembly segments
> >> being a
2011/8/11 Gleb Smirnoff
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 09:38:04AM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote:
> F> However, I'm not sure I understand the reasoning for removing the carpX
> F> pseudo-interface. It's really nice having the symmetry between carpX,
> F> vlanX, brX, and other pseudo-interfaces, and keepin
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 02:47:08PM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote:
F> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 09:38:04AM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote:
F> > F> However, I'm not sure I understand the reasoning for removing the carpX
F> > F> pseudo-interface. It's really nice having the symmetry between carpX,
F> > F> vla
