Hi,
> On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 16:42:06 +1000
> Mattia Rossi said:
mrossi> Anyhow, the manpage is really not clear about name_servers_append, and
mrossi> it's not working as expected either:
mrossi> 1) If I put in a comma separated list of nameservers, I'll find that
mrossi> comma separated
On 10.08.2011, at 7:48, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
> What freebsd are you running on? I suppose it is release, because on STABLE
> this issue should be fixed -- the secondary terminates after timeout.
I was running 8.2-RELEASE-p2 and now just upgraded to 8.2-STABLE. This really
seems
to have helped:
Hi,
I sent a pr (kern/157418) that the em driver seems to be buggy for Intel
82579LM Gigabit Network Connection which passed unnoticed. I now tried
it in FreeBSD 9.0-BETA1 and the problem is still present.
Does anyone else have this problem or have any ideas on how to fix it? I
assume that the in
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 11:51 PM, Marek Salwerowicz wrote:
> W dniu 2011-08-09 18:04, Freddie Cash pisze:
>
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 4:59 AM, Marek Salwerowicz
>> wrote:
>>
>> I have set up a new router for my network, with separated DMZ zone for my
>>> internet servers. I'd like computers from
Hello networkers,
I'd like to present for review and early testing (for brave ones)
a new CARP implementation. The reason for this rewrite was that CARP
protocol actually doesn't bring a new interface, but is a property of
interface address. Rewriting it in this way helps to remove several
hac
I have limited access to this hardware, I am told I will tomorrow, and will
repro
and test a fix that I have in mind, so stay tuned. I just noticed this bug
is at
a low priority, it should be higher than that.
Jack
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 6:44 AM, Tomas Svensson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I sent a pr (k
2011/8/10 Gleb Smirnoff
> I'd like to present for review and early testing (for brave ones)
> a new CARP implementation. The reason for this rewrite was that CARP
> protocol actually doesn't bring a new interface, but is a property of
> interface address. Rewriting it in this way helps to remov
On 10/08/2011 17:29, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 16:42:06 +1000
Mattia Rossi said:
mrossi> Anyhow, the manpage is really not clear about name_servers_append, and
mrossi> it's not working as expected either:
mrossi> 1) If I put in a comma separated list of nameservers, I
On 08/05/11 00:19, Steven Hartland wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Lawrence Stewart"
[snip]
So I suppose the question is should maxsegments be larger by
default due to the recent changes e.g.
- V_tcp_reass_maxseg = nmbclusters / 16;
+ V_tcp_reass_maxseg = nmbclusters / 8;
or is the
On 08/05/11 16:57, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 12:02:18AM +1000, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
[snip]
The real fix which is somewhere down on my todo list is to make all
these memory constraints elastic and respond to VM pressure, thus
negating the need for a hard limit at all.
10 matches
Mail list logo