On 07/03/2011 10:56 PM, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
There is internal queue of messages in the mpd-5.5 with length 8129.
Messages are generated based on various events and enqueued there, then
processed.
Mpd uses GRED algorithm to prevent overload: it accepts all new L2TP connections
when queue has
Note: to view an individual PR, use:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsolete releases.
S Tracker
Hi!
We've three servers, connected as S1 <-ng_tunnel-> S2 <-ng_tunnel-> S3.
Over tunnels runs BGP with full-view.
Sometimes on S2 occures fatal trap with automatic reboot or without
reboot at all. It not depends of net loading (mbps or pps).
If process of save a core was successfull, backtra
04.07.2011 15:30, Adrian Minta пишет:
> if I undestand corectly, in order to increase the connection rate I need
> to replace 60 with 600 and 10 with 100 like this:
>
>#define SETOVERLOAD(q)do {\
> int t = (q);
Hi,
At one of my customers we have had 2 ISPs for a long time but now we
have to support IPv6 too.
In the IPv4 world I used ipfw for policy-based routing to separate
traffic from the two public address ranges:
ipfw add 1010 allow ip from any to MY_IP_RANGES
ipfw add 1020 fwd ISP1_GW ip f
>It seems, enough. But, are you sure your L2TP client will wait
>for overloaded daemon to complete connection? The change will
>proportionally increase responsiveness of mpd - it has not enough CPU
>horsepower to process requests timely.
>
>Eugene Grosbein
Actually something else is happening.
I
What do you have net.graph.threads set to ? With the load avg so high,
perhaps you are just running into processing limits with so many
connections ? amotin would know.
---Mike
On 7/4/2011 1:16 PM, Adrian Minta wrote:
>> It seems, enough. But, are you sure your L2TP client will wait
>
>
> What do you have net.graph.threads set to ? With the load avg so high,
> perhaps you are just running into processing limits with so many
> connections ? amotin would know.
>
> ---Mike
>
No, I didn't touch it.
lns# sysctl net.graph.threads
net.graph.threads: 8
How big should this be f
Synopsis: [udp] Unable to send UDP packet via IPv6 socket to IPv4 mapped address
State-Changed-From-To: open->patched
State-Changed-By: bz
State-Changed-When: Mon Jul 4 19:11:06 UTC 2011
State-Changed-Why:
Seems I fixed it lately in r220463.
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->bz
Responsi
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 08:16:19PM +0300, Adrian Minta wrote:
> >It seems, enough. But, are you sure your L2TP client will wait
> >for overloaded daemon to complete connection? The change will
> >proportionally increase responsiveness of mpd - it has not enough CPU
> >horsepower to process request
I merged both of your responses below, so that the thread doesn't get
fragmented.
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 4:07 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> **
> On 7/1/11 12:59 AM, Michael MacLeod wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
>> On 6/29/11 11:28 AM, Michael MacLeod wrote:
> You should study why existing connections break,
> do clients disconnect themselves or server disconnect them?
> You'll need turn off detailed logs, read mpd's documentation.
>
> Also, there are system-wide queues for NETGRAPH messages that can overflow
> and that's bad thing. Check them out with
On 7/4/11 5:24 AM, Paul Schenkeveld wrote:
Hi,
At one of my customers we have had 2 ISPs for a long time but now we
have to support IPv6 too.
In the IPv4 world I used ipfw for policy-based routing to separate
traffic from the two public address ranges:
ipfw add 1010 allow ip from any to M
Synopsis: [re] re0 driver quit working on Acer AO751h between 8.0 and 8.2 (also
9.0) [regression]
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: yongari
State-Changed-When: Tue Jul 5 00:34:34 UTC 2011
State-Changed-Why:
There had been a lot of re(4) changes since 8.0-RELEASE so it's
har
Synopsis: [re] re0 driver quit working on Acer AO751h between 8.0 and 8.2 (also
9.0) [regression]
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->yongari
Responsible-Changed-By: yongari
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Jul 5 00:35:48 UTC 2011
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Grab.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/que
Hello,
We're running a few 8.1-R servers with Broadcom bce interfaces (Dell R510)
and I'm seeing occasional packet loss on them (enough that it trips nagios
now and then). Cabling seems fine as neither the switch nor the sysctl
info for the device show any errors/collisions/etc, however there
If I try to set up a carp interface for IPv6 on a recent 8.2-STABLE I
get an error using either /64 or /128 as the mask:
ifconfig carp2 vhid 4 advskew 0 pass mycleverpass 2001:a:b:c::2/64
ifconfig 2001:a:b:c::2/64: bad value (width too large)
There are no examples for IPv6 in the man page, or
On 07/04/11 19:59, Doug Barton wrote:
If I try to set up a carp interface for IPv6 on a recent 8.2-STABLE I
get an error using either /64 or /128 as the mask:
ifconfig carp2 vhid 4 advskew 0 pass mycleverpass 2001:a:b:c::2/64
ifconfig 2001:a:b:c::2/64: bad value (width too large)
There are no
On 07/04/2011 20:26, Michael Sinatra wrote:
On 07/04/11 19:59, Doug Barton wrote:
If I try to set up a carp interface for IPv6 on a recent 8.2-STABLE I
get an error using either /64 or /128 as the mask:
ifconfig carp2 vhid 4 advskew 0 pass mycleverpass 2001:a:b:c::2/64
ifconfig 2001:a:b:c::2/6
On 07/04/2011 21:20, Doug Barton wrote:
On 07/04/2011 20:26, Michael Sinatra wrote:
On 07/04/11 19:59, Doug Barton wrote:
If I try to set up a carp interface for IPv6 on a recent 8.2-STABLE I
get an error using either /64 or /128 as the mask:
ifconfig carp2 vhid 4 advskew 0 pass mycleverpass 2
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [sorry for the delay]
>
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Emil Muratov wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi all.
>>>
>>> I have a small home router/nas running nvidia ion plat
Hi,
[Moving thread to -current, added a...@freebsd.org to the Cc: list as he
changed that code recently.]
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>>
On 07/04/11 21:29, Doug Barton wrote:
On 07/04/2011 21:20, Doug Barton wrote:
On 07/04/2011 20:26, Michael Sinatra wrote:
On 07/04/11 19:59, Doug Barton wrote:
If I try to set up a carp interface for IPv6 on a recent 8.2-STABLE I
get an error using either /64 or /128 as the mask:
ifconfig car
23 matches
Mail list logo
