Hello,
I am testing a RAS solution and I experience some crashes when the L2TP
tunnels grow above 3500. The IPv6 is disabled on the box. With IPv6
enabled the limit is around 1700 (half). Does anyone has a sugesstion
what I should try next ?
total traffic: ~ 100mbps
load averages: ~1.8
Kern
On 6/23/2011 8:55 AM, Adrian Minta wrote:
> Hello,
> I am testing a RAS solution and I experience some crashes when the L2TP
> tunnels grow above 3500. The IPv6 is disabled on the box. With IPv6
> enabled the limit is around 1700 (half). Does anyone has a sugesstion
> what I should try next ?
Ther
> On 6/23/2011 8:55 AM, Adrian Minta wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I am testing a RAS solution and I experience some crashes when the L2TP
>> tunnels grow above 3500. The IPv6 is disabled on the box. With IPv6
>> enabled the limit is around 1700 (half). Does anyone has a sugesstion
>> what I should try next
On Jun 23, 2011, at 12:55 PM, Adrian Minta wrote:
> Hello,
> I am testing a RAS solution and I experience some crashes when the L2TP
> tunnels grow above 3500.
I guess you mean sessions, not tunnels.
> The IPv6 is disabled on the box. With IPv6 enabled the limit is around 1700
> (half). Does
On 6/23/2011 11:56 AM, Adrian Minta wrote:
>
> Sorry if I miss something, but just started using freebsd, I use mostly
> linux.
> The server use AMD64 flavor and have 4G of RAM.
> RELENG_8 is not the prerelease for 8.0 ? I have 8.2-RELEASE isn't it newer ?
>
Hi,
RELENG_8 is the present s
Hi!
Another way for vlans is: "ng_ether + ng_vlan + ng_iface".
See in sources: VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM
I don’t see any profits with hardware PPPoE, mpd5 is fast.
For hardware NAT you can try make "closed" netgraph based interface.
Node like "ng_ether + ng_nat" = ng_hwnat, compatible
> *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8
>
>
> csup -g -L2 -h cvsup10.freebsd.org /tmp/stable-supfile
>
> This will pull down all the source for the RELENG_8, the most uptodate
> source tree and put it in /usr/src from the cvsup mirror
> cvsup10.freebsd.org. Where you see references to cvsup (the clie
> On 6/23/2011 1:37 PM, Adrian Minta wrote:
>>> *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8
>>> Then follow the steps to install the kernel and world
>>>
>>> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/makeworld.html
>>
>> Thank you !
>> My server is stable now with 3572 sessions.
>> The issue now seems to be the r
On 6/23/2011 1:37 PM, Adrian Minta wrote:
>> *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8
>> Then follow the steps to install the kernel and world
>>
>> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/makeworld.html
>
> Thank you !
> My server is stable now with 3572 sessions.
> The issue now seems to be the rate of new
Old Synopsis: bce driver shows "no carrier" on IBM blade (HS22 with BCM5709)
New Synopsis: [bce] bce driver shows "no carrier" on IBM blade (HS22 with
BCM5709)
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Jun 23 18:13:10 UTC
Oops i spoke too soon ...
The system is stable without hyperthreading. With hyperthreading activated
i't freezes again.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "fr
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> Affinity to open source eh, you mean they repackage Intel hardware and
> then just use MY drivers, they've been doing it for 1G, and now they're
> gonna extend their "affinity" to 10G it seems, impressive :)
>
AFAICS, files in `sys/dev/e10
On 6/23/2011 3:18 PM, Adrian Minta wrote:
> Oops i spoke too soon ...
> The system is stable without hyperthreading. With hyperthreading activated
> i't freezes again.
>
I also run with
devd_enable="NO"
in /etc/rc.conf
and
in /etc/syctl.conf
kern.random.sys.harvest.ethernet=0
Does it actually
Try:
net.inet.ip.fastforwarding = 0
net.isr.bindthreads = 1
net.isr.direct = 0
net.isr.direct_force = 0
--
Rozhuk Ivan
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> n...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Mike Tancsa
> Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 4:56
On 6/23/2011 4:17 PM, rozhuk...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Try:
> net.inet.ip.fastforwarding = 0
> net.isr.bindthreads = 1
> net.isr.direct = 0
> net.isr.direct_force = 0
If net.isr.direct is disabled, does setting net.isr.bindthreads do
anything ? Also, why disable the fastforwarding ?
---Mi
net.inet.ip.fastforwarding
- double check incoming packet, if: dst = this host / multicast / contain
options
- all packets processing by one cpu core
This option is good for one cpu core routers.
--
Rozhuk Ivan
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Tancsa [mailto:m...@sentex.net]
> S
Hi!
Changes:
1. list + hash was replaced by array of hooks: its simple and faster
2. added encap setting.
"getencap" and "setencap" messages for control it:
Default = 1 (do the VLAN encapsulation)
0: no encapsulation, just:
m->m_flags |= M_VLANTAG;
m->m_pkthdr.ether_vtag = (vlan & EVL_VLID_M
On 6/23/2011 5:47 PM, rozhuk...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> net.inet.ip.fastforwarding
> - double check incoming packet, if: dst = this host / multicast / contain
> options
> - all packets processing by one cpu core
>
> This option is good for one cpu core routers.
Thanks, I didnt know that. And the
18 matches
Mail list logo
