The following reply was made to PR kern/153671; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Eugene Grosbein
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/153671: [em] [panic] 8.2-PRERELEASE repeatable kernel in
if_em(4)
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 15:17:55 +0700
Hi!
All needed changes were MFC'd an
The following reply was made to PR kern/153255; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Eugene Grosbein
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/153255: [panic] 8.2-PRERELEASE repeatable kernel panic under
heavy network load
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 15:32:37 +0700
Hi!
All needed changes
Synopsis: [panic] 8.2-PRERELEASE repeatable kernel panic under heavy network
load
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: vwe
State-Changed-When: Fri Apr 29 09:37:09 UTC 2011
State-Changed-Why:
issue reported to be fixed and MFC'ed already.
Thank you for reporting, Eugene!
http://
Hi,
may somebody epxplain it for me, what can cause collisions on tun
interfaces created by ppp(8) and openvpn?
> uname -a
FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0 i386
> netstat -i
NameMtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs IdropOpkts Oerrs
Coll
tun0 1492 18940349
On 29.04.2011 00:44, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Freebsd-net.
>
> Does queue/sched masks work with IPv6 addresses? I can not find any
> examples for this, all examples are with 32-bit masks only...
Hi,
it should work, just try use bigger masks values and ipv6 specifiers.
--
WBR, Andrey V
Synopsis: [em] [panic] 8.2-PRERELEASE repeatable kernel in if_em(4)
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: vwe
State-Changed-When: Fri Apr 29 10:58:06 UTC 2011
State-Changed-Why:
Eugene reported this issue has been solved and all changes are MFC'd
to 8-STABLE.
Thank you for reporti
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 09:41:01PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> We rarely test 32bit any more, the only time we would is because of a
> problem,
> so 99% is amd64, so that's not the problem.
>
> Running netperf without any special arguments, using TCP_STREAM and
> TCP_MAERTS tests what numbers are y
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:52:31PM +0300, Zeus V Panchenko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> may somebody epxplain it for me, what can cause collisions on tun
> interfaces created by ppp(8) and openvpn?
>
> > uname -a
> FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0 i386
>
> > netstat -i
> NameMtu Network Address
YongHyeon PYUN (pyu...@gmail.com) [11.04.29 21:29] wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:52:31PM +0300, Zeus V Panchenko wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > may somebody epxplain it for me, what can cause collisions on tun
> > interfaces created by ppp(8) and openvpn?
> >
> > > uname -a
> > FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 09:46:34PM +0300, Zeus V Panchenko wrote:
> YongHyeon PYUN (pyu...@gmail.com) [11.04.29 21:29] wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:52:31PM +0300, Zeus V Panchenko wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > may somebody epxplain it for me, what can cause collisions on tun
> > > interfac
Hello,
I sent a email to current@ two months ago about F-RTO patch CFR but
didn't get proper feedbacks from yours. And at now two months later, I
have prepared my final code for F-RTO patch and checked it's working for
SACK enabled and disabled environments:
http://people.freebsd.org/~we
11 matches
Mail list logo
